The same funnel math your battalion CO uses. Without the briefing slides.
Drop your station’s funnel in. We compute stage-by-stage conversion against verified public benchmarks — Navy NRC reporting (VADM Cheeseman, 2024), USAREC analysis, DoD IG, Air & Space Forces Magazine. Output is a one-page debrief: which stage is your actual leak, where your numbers are at or above baseline, and the source-cited sentence you can use to defend each one. Nothing is stored. No PII. Numbers stay in your browser.
Navy NRC FY23 funnel publicly disclosed by then-NRC commander VADM Rick Cheeseman to Navy Times (Feb 2024): 1,230 daily appointments → 879 showed → 366 medically qualified → 140 onboarded.
Enter numbers above. The table fills in as you type.
Nothing you enter is sent to a server. Numbers stay in your browser and are cleared when you close the tab.
Where the baselines come from.
- Appointments → shipped sailors: ~10%. VADM Rick Cheeseman, Chief of Naval Personnel (then NRC Commander), reported to Navy Times in February 2024 that of roughly 1,230 daily scheduled appointments, ~879 showed up, ~366 qualified, ~140 onboarded — ~11% appointment to sailor. Source
- Genesis caused a ~31% productivity drop initially; ~20% sustained. Council on Foreign Relations summary citing services’ own analysis. Source
- Contact-to-contract days: 33.8 → 63.4 (Navy, post-Genesis). Military Times reporting on the Genesis transition, April 2023. Source
- USAREC waiver-consult time: up to 70+ days. Task & Purpose coverage citing USAREC’s own analysis. Source
- FY22: 1-in-6 recruits required a waiver. DoD IG, May 2023, via Military Times. Source
- ~23% of 17–24-year-olds currently eligible. OSD figure cited by ASVAB CEP. Source
These are cross-branch public-source benchmarks. They are useful for orientation — they are not your specific NTAG, brigade, AFRS group, or MCRSS quota. If your unit publishes its own benchmarks internally, those override what is here.