Skip to main content
HonestMOS
InvestigationsCongress made VA disability claims free to file. An entire industry charges veterans anyway — and nobody can stop them.
Guide · DCSA Adjudicative Guidelines

Security Clearance Guide: SF-86, Adjudication & What Actually Gets You Denied

How security clearances actually work — the SF-86 walkthrough, all 13 adjudicative guidelines explained plainly, what disqualifies you versus what is manageable, realistic timelines by clearance level, and how to respond to a denial. The information your security officer gives you in a briefing, and what they leave out.

!This is educational information, not legal advice. Security clearance situations are highly fact-specific. If you receive a Statement of Reasons (SOR) or a denial, consult a security clearance attorney before responding.
4
Clearance Levels
Confidential · Secret · TS · TS/SCI
10 yrs
SF-86 Lookback
Addresses, employment, contacts
13
Adjudicative Guidelines
No single one is automatic denial
Free
Legal Help
Installation Legal Assistance / TDS

Clearance Levels

Four levels. Each requires a more intensive investigation. The clearance is granted to the position, not the person — access stops when the billet does.

Confidential

Reinvestigation
15-year reinvestigation
Cost to Government
~$3,000

Access to information that could cause damage to national security if disclosed. Most common clearance for routine military positions.

Confidential is the entry-level clearance and covers information that could cause identifiable damage to national security if disclosed without authorization. It requires a National Agency Check with Law and Credit (NACLC) investigation and must be reinvestigated every 15 years. Most junior enlisted positions that require a clearance start here. If you have a clearance at this level, it does not automatically mean you can access Secret or Top Secret information — access is always need-to-know, and the clearance is the floor, not the ceiling.

Secret

Reinvestigation
10-year reinvestigation
Cost to Government
~$5,000

Access to information that could cause serious damage to national security. Required for the majority of clearance-bearing MOS/ratings.

Secret clearance covers information that could cause serious damage to national security. It requires a more thorough background investigation — interviews with neighbors, employers, and references going back 10 years. This is the workhorse clearance. The vast majority of cleared military positions require Secret. It must be reinvestigated every 10 years through a Periodic Reinvestigation (PR). Interim Secret clearances are common — they allow you to start working in a cleared position while the full investigation is ongoing.

Top Secret

Reinvestigation
5-year reinvestigation
Cost to Government
~$10,000

Access to information that could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security. Intensive investigation; 5-year reinvestigation cycle.

Top Secret covers information where unauthorized disclosure could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security. The Single Scope Background Investigation (SSBI) is far more intensive — investigators interview former spouses, neighbors from years ago, professors, and foreign contacts. The 5-year reinvestigation cycle reflects how much can change in a person's life. Financial changes, foreign travel, new relationships, and changes in personal conduct are all re-examined. Maintaining a TS clearance requires ongoing attention to the same factors that were investigated initially.

TS/SCI

Reinvestigation
5-year + polygraph
Cost to Government
~$15,000+

Top Secret with Sensitive Compartmented Information access. Requires polygraph for most positions. Controlled through Special Access Programs (SAPs).

TS/SCI is not technically a separate clearance level — it is a Top Secret clearance PLUS access to specific Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) compartments. You need a separate SCI indoctrination for each compartment you are read into. Most TS/SCI positions also require a polygraph — either a Counterintelligence Scope (CI Poly) or a Full Scope (lifestyle) polygraph depending on the agency and position. NSA, CIA, NRO, and NGA have their own polygraph programs. The polygraph is not part of the background investigation itself — it is a separate requirement layered on top. Timeline for TS/SCI with polygraph: 12–24 months is common. For high-demand agencies during hiring surges, longer is not unusual. Key fact: The clearance is tied to the POSITION, not the person. When you leave a position that required TS/SCI, that access is typically deactivated. You retain eligibility if the investigation is still current, but the access itself stops when the billet does.

The SF-86 (eQIP) — What It Actually Asks

The Standard Form 86 is the backbone of every clearance investigation. It covers 10 years of your life in detail. The number-one mistake people make is omitting things they think won't be found. Investigators talk to your neighbors, coworkers, professors, and former partners. Disclosed issues are almost always survivable. Concealment is not.

1

Gather 10 years of addresses

The SF-86 requires every address where you have lived for the past 10 years, including dates and contact information for a verifier at each location. Gather this before starting — hunting for old addresses while filling out the form causes errors and gaps.

2

Compile employment history

Every employer for the past 10 years, with supervisor names and contact information. Gaps in employment must be explained. Self-employment requires documentation. Military service counts as employment.

3

List all foreign contacts

The SF-86 asks about foreign nationals you have close contact with — meaning contact that is not incidental. This includes family members, close friends, romantic partners, and business associates who are not US citizens or permanent residents. List them all. Investigators will find them.

4

Document all financial issues honestly

List every delinquent account, judgment, lien, bankruptcy, and debt. For each issue, include the circumstances, what happened, and what you have done or are doing to resolve it. Context is everything — investigators distinguish between financial irresponsibility and genuine hardship.

5

Disclose drug use accurately

The SF-86 asks about drug use going back 7 years for most drugs, and for any prior use of certain substances. Answer accurately. "I tried marijuana in college" with a decade of clean record is a very different picture than "I used marijuana regularly until last year." Accuracy matters more than the answer.

6

List mental health contacts — do not omit them

Therapy, counseling, psychiatric evaluation, and inpatient treatment must be listed if they occurred within the relevant time frames. Exception: marriage counseling, family counseling, and grief counseling are generally not required to be listed. Voluntary mental health treatment will not disqualify you. Omitting it and having it discovered might.

7

List all criminal history including dismissed charges

The SF-86 asks about arrests, charges, convictions, and dismissed charges. It also asks about criminal conduct you were not arrested for. Answer honestly. Expunged records must still be disclosed on federal forms — state expungement does not remove the obligation to report.

8

Have someone review it before submission

Ask a trusted person — ideally a JAG officer or cleared colleague who has been through the process — to review your SF-86 before submitting. Errors and omissions are easiest to catch before submission. Corrections after submission are possible but draw attention to the inconsistency.

The foundational principle: Investigators are not looking for a perfect record. They are looking for honesty, reliability, and judgment. A person who discloses past mistakes and demonstrates they have addressed them is considered a better risk than someone with a clean-looking record who is hiding something.

The 13 Adjudicative Guidelines

These are the official criteria used to adjudicate every clearance. No single guideline is automatically disqualifying — each is weighed under the whole-person concept. The guidelines below reflect the actual DCSA adjudicative standards.

SEAD 4 identifies these guidelines by letter (A through M), not by number. The letter designations are shown below.

A

Allegiance to the United States

critical

Advocacy for overthrow of the US government, membership in organizations that seek to do so, or acts of sabotage or treason.

Rare in practice. The concern is active advocacy or organizational membership — not political opinion. Legitimate political dissent is not a disqualifier.
B

Foreign Influence

high

Foreign nationals in your immediate family or close social network who could use that relationship to influence you.

This is one of the most commonly cited guidelines. Having a spouse, parent, or sibling with foreign citizenship is NOT automatically disqualifying. The question is whether that relationship creates a potential for coercion or divided loyalty. Mitigating factors: family member is a citizen/resident of a friendly nation, limited contact, no financial dependency, family member does not work for foreign government or military. Full disclosure is essential — investigators will find foreign contacts regardless.
C

Foreign Preference

high

Actions that suggest preference for a foreign country over the United States — dual citizenship exercised, foreign passports used, military or government service for a foreign nation.

Holding dual citizenship is not automatically disqualifying. Using a foreign passport to enter/exit foreign countries while a US citizen is more problematic. Renouncing foreign citizenship or otherwise demonstrating US allegiance is strong mitigation. Serving in a foreign military without prior US government approval is a significant problem.
D

Sexual Behavior

conditional

Sexual behavior is only an issue if it creates vulnerability to exploitation, coercion, or reflects poor judgment with national security implications.

This guideline is NOT about sexual orientation. Consensual adult conduct is not an adjudicative concern. The question is whether the conduct creates a coercion risk (undisclosed behavior that could be used for blackmail), involves illegal activity, or reflects a pattern of predatory behavior. Full disclosure eliminates the coercion concern entirely.
E

Personal Conduct

high

Dishonesty, unreliability, and lack of candor — particularly on the SF-86 itself.

This is the guillotine guideline. You can survive almost any past issue if you are honest about it. If you omit something and it's discovered — and it usually is — the omission itself becomes the disqualifying issue, independent of whatever you were hiding. Investigators talk to people who know you: neighbors, former coworkers, professors, ex-partners. They do not rely solely on what you self-report.
F

Financial Considerations

high

The most commonly cited guideline. Pattern of financial irresponsibility — not debt alone — is the concern.

Debt alone does not disqualify you. Tens of thousands in student loan debt with a repayment plan is not the same as $50,000 in unpaid collections with no plan and no explanation. What investigators look for: pattern of non-payment, judgments, liens, repossessions, unpaid taxes, delinquent accounts with no evident effort to address them. Bankruptcy CAN be survivable. If it resulted from documented medical emergency, divorce, or other circumstances outside your control, and you have a repayment plan or the debt has been discharged, document it thoroughly. The key is demonstrating the behavior was situational, not dispositional. What gets people: Unexplained spending significantly beyond their income (possible indicator of selling classified info), unresolved IRS liens, multiple accounts in collections with no contact made, gambling debts.
G

Alcohol Consumption

moderate

Alcohol use that affects reliability, judgment, or creates legal problems.

A single DUI years ago with no pattern is generally manageable. Multiple DUIs, alcohol-related terminations, or untreated alcohol dependency are more serious. Completed alcohol treatment programs are viewed favorably — they show acknowledgment and remediation. Current, active alcohol abuse is a significant problem.
H

Drug Involvement

high

Past drug use is often survivable. Active use is not. Marijuana remains a federal issue regardless of state law.

Experimental or limited past marijuana use that has stopped is generally manageable, especially if it was recent enough to disclose on the SF-86 but distant enough to show a pattern of cessation. Marijuana: Regardless of state legalization, marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law. Current use — meaning use since you knew you were being considered for a clearance — is disqualifying. Recent past use (within the last 12 months) is a significant concern. Use that stopped years ago with documented cessation is manageable. Hard drugs (cocaine, heroin, meth, psychedelics): More scrutiny. Experimentation vs. pattern of use matters. Selling drugs is a much more serious issue than using them. Prescription drug abuse: Misuse of prescription medications is treated as drug involvement. Being honest about past use while demonstrating it has stopped is the path through this guideline.
I

Psychological Conditions

Low if treated

Voluntary mental health treatment is NOT disqualifying. Untreated conditions that affect judgment and reliability are the actual concern.

This is the most misunderstood guideline. Executive Order 13764 and subsequent DoD policy explicitly state that seeking mental health treatment does not, by itself, affect clearance eligibility. Therapy, counseling, psychiatric medication, and even hospitalization for a treatable condition — when under professional care — are viewed favorably as evidence of self-awareness and responsible management. What investigators actually care about: conditions that are untreated, that cause a person to act erratically or unpredictably, that impair judgment, or that have led to behavior that raises other security concerns. An untreated condition that caused a violent incident is a problem. The same condition actively treated by a licensed professional is not. Do not let fear of clearance implications stop you from seeking mental health treatment. Avoiding treatment often makes outcomes worse — for you and for the clearance.
J

Criminal Conduct

high

Criminal history — arrests, charges, convictions, and admitted criminal conduct not resulting in arrest.

Single offense, minor nature, long ago, with evidence of rehabilitation: often manageable. Pattern of criminal conduct: serious problem. Violent crimes and crimes of dishonesty (fraud, theft) are viewed more harshly than situational offenses. Juvenile records may be considered. Expunged records must still be disclosed — the SF-86 explicitly asks about dismissed charges and juvenile records.
K

Handling Protected Information

critical

Prior unauthorized disclosure of classified or protected information, or patterns of carelessness with sensitive material.

Prior clearance violations are a serious adjudicative concern. This includes unauthorized removal of classified material, failure to safeguard sensitive information, and any prior incidents that led to loss of access or administrative action. Careless handling patterns — even without deliberate disclosure — are concerning because they predict future behavior.
L

Outside Activities

moderate

Employment, consulting, or organizational affiliations that could conflict with security responsibilities.

Foreign business interests, consulting for foreign governments or entities, membership in organizations that could create conflicts of interest. Most common issue: service members with undisclosed side businesses or consulting arrangements, particularly with defense contractors or foreign-connected entities. Disclosure is the mitigation — disclosed activities can be evaluated; undisclosed ones look like concealment.
M

Use of Information Technology Systems

moderate

Unauthorized access to computer systems, violations of acceptable use policies, introduction of malware, or similar IT-related misconduct.

Hacking, unauthorized access to others' accounts, violating IT policies at work or school, or deliberate misuse of systems are the core concerns. Minor policy violations without deliberate intent are typically manageable. A pattern of ignoring IT policies or deliberate intrusions are more serious. Prior security incidents on classified systems are particularly damaging.

The Whole Person Concept

No single factor is automatically disqualifying. Adjudicators weigh the totality of the evidence. This is both reassuring and demanding — it means a troubled record can still result in a clearance, but it also means a mostly clean record with one serious unresolved issue might not.

What Investigators Weigh
Nature and seriousness
How severe was the conduct? A DUI is not the same as a pattern of fraud.
Recency
An issue from 15 years ago weighs less than the same issue from last year.
Frequency and pattern
A single incident is viewed differently than repeated conduct of the same type.
Circumstances
Did external events (job loss, medical crisis, divorce) contribute? Document it.
Voluntariness
Was the problematic behavior chosen or coerced? Context matters.
Subsequent conduct
What did you do after the issue occurred? Remediation demonstrates character.
Rehabilitation
Treatment, repayment, counseling — concrete steps taken are evidence of change.
Likelihood of recurrence
Is this a resolved issue, or are the conditions that caused it still present?

Investigation Timelines

These are general ranges based on current DCSA processing. Timelines vary with backlog, complexity of the case, and the hiring agency. Complex cases — many foreign contacts, unresolved financial issues, prior adverse conduct — always take longer.

Confidential

1–3 months
Often granted within weeks
NACLC investigation. Fastest resolution of the four levels.

Secret

1–6 months
Interim Secret common while investigation runs
NACLC or Tier 3 investigation. Most common clearance in the military.

Top Secret

6–18 months
Interim TS possible; some positions require full adjudication before access
SSBI investigation. Significantly more intensive — former employers, references, neighbors all interviewed.

TS/SCI (with polygraph)

12–24 months+
Interim rarely granted for SCI-level access
Agency-specific programs. Polygraph adds time and complexity. NSA, CIA, NRO hiring pipelines often run 18+ months.

What Actually Gets People Denied — and What Doesn't

The honest breakdown of what actually drives denials versus what people assume is disqualifying but often isn't.

Will likely deny
  • Recent foreign contacts not disclosed on the SF-86
  • Significant unexplained debt ($50K+) with no repayment plan and no explanation
  • Active drug use — any substance — since becoming aware of the clearance requirement
  • Pattern of dishonesty across multiple guidelines (the whole-person concept cuts both ways)
  • Undisclosed foreign financial interests or business arrangements
  • Prior clearance revocation or security violations at another agency
  • Lying on the SF-86 — discovered omissions are often worse than the underlying issue
People think will deny — often doesn't
  • Past therapy or counseling (explicitly protected; see Guideline I — Psychological Conditions)
  • Past marijuana use that stopped — honest disclosure + cessation is the path through
  • Past bankruptcy — circumstances matter; document everything
  • Family members with foreign citizenship — mitigating factors exist; full disclosure required
  • Single DUI from years ago with clean record since
  • Foreign travel for work or personal reasons — disclose all of it; travel itself is not disqualifying
  • Moderate debt with a documented repayment plan

Statement of Reasons (SOR) & Appeals

Getting an SOR is not a denial. It is an opportunity. Getting a denial is not the end — you have formal appeal rights. Know the process before it happens.

1

You Receive a Statement of Reasons (SOR)

The SOR identifies specific adjudicative concerns and gives you a chance to respond before a final decision is made. It is a formal legal document. Read it carefully — the specific guidelines cited tell you exactly what needs to be addressed. You typically have 20–30 days to respond.

2

Consult a Security Clearance Attorney

This is not the time for DIY. Security clearance law is specialized. An attorney who handles DOHA cases regularly will know what arguments are effective, what documentation is needed, and how to frame your response. The response you submit to the SOR can make or break the outcome.

3

Submit Your Written Response

Address every allegation in the SOR with facts, documentation, and context. For financial issues: account statements, repayment records, explanations of circumstances. For drug issues: documented cessation, negative tests. For personal conduct: character references, explanation of circumstances, evidence of change. More documentation is better.

4

Request a Hearing (If Applicable)

For DoD cases through DOHA, you have the right to a hearing before an administrative judge. You can present evidence, call witnesses, and cross-examine government witnesses. A hearing gives you more opportunity to tell your story than a written response alone.

5

Appeal to DOHA Appeal Board or Agency Board

If the judge denies the clearance, you can appeal to the DOHA Appeal Board (DoD cases) or the relevant agency appeals board (intelligence community cases). The appeal is typically on the record — new evidence is limited. Legal representation is essentially required at this stage.

Frequently Asked Questions

The questions that come up most — answered directly and honestly.

Will therapy or seeing a psychiatrist deny my clearance?

No. Executive Order 13764 and DoD policy explicitly state that seeking mental health treatment does not, by itself, disqualify you from a clearance. Voluntary counseling, therapy, psychiatric medication, and outpatient treatment are not disqualifying. What investigators care about is whether an untreated condition affects your judgment, reliability, or conduct — not whether you sought help for it. Fear of clearance implications is one of the most harmful reasons service members avoid mental health treatment. Seek the care you need.

Can I get a clearance if I have used marijuana?

Past marijuana use that has stopped is often manageable. The key factors are how recent the use was, how frequent it was, whether it was disclosed honestly, and whether use has genuinely ceased. Marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law regardless of state legalization — current use after becoming aware of a clearance requirement is disqualifying. If use stopped years ago and you are honest about it, many investigators will apply the whole-person concept and grant the clearance, particularly for non-frequent, non-recent use.

What happens if I get a Statement of Reasons (SOR)?

A Statement of Reasons means an adjudicator has identified issues that could prevent granting your clearance, and they are giving you an opportunity to respond before a final decision. You typically have 20-30 days to submit a written response. This is not a denial — it is an opportunity to provide context, documentation, and rebuttal. You should contact a security clearance attorney immediately upon receiving an SOR. The response you submit can determine whether you receive the clearance. If denied after the SOR process, you have appeal rights through DOHA (DoD cases) or the relevant agency appeals board.

Does a bankruptcy hurt my clearance?

Bankruptcy alone is not disqualifying. Adjudicators look at the circumstances: Was it caused by a medical emergency, divorce, or other hardship outside your control? Was the bankruptcy a responsible decision to resolve overwhelming debt rather than continuing to ignore it? Is there a pattern of financial irresponsibility before and after, or was this an isolated event? Bankruptcy that resolves a debt problem responsibly — with documentation of the circumstances — is viewed more favorably than the same debt load simply being ignored. Document everything and be honest about what happened.

My spouse/parent is a foreign national. Will that deny my clearance?

Not automatically. Guideline B (Foreign Influence) requires the adjudicator to weigh whether the relationship creates an actual vulnerability to coercion or divided loyalty. Mitigating factors include: the foreign national is a citizen of a friendly allied nation, limited contact with that country's government or military, no financial dependency that could be leveraged, and your demonstrated US allegiance. Full disclosure of all foreign contacts is essential — undisclosed foreign contacts are a much bigger problem than disclosed ones.

How long does a security clearance investigation take?

Timelines vary significantly based on level, agency, and current backlog. General ranges: Secret — 1 to 6 months; Top Secret — 6 to 18 months; TS/SCI — 12 to 24 months; TS/SCI with polygraph at certain agencies — up to 24 months or longer. Interim clearances are common at Secret and TS levels, allowing you to begin working in a cleared position before the full investigation is complete. Complex cases — many foreign contacts, financial issues, prior drug use requiring resolution — take longer regardless of the level.

Can I appeal if my clearance is denied?

Yes. For DoD cases, you have the right to appeal through the Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals (DOHA). You can request a hearing before an administrative judge, present evidence, and call witnesses. If the judge denies the clearance, you can appeal to the DOHA Appeal Board, and ultimately to the courts. For intelligence agency cases, the process varies by agency — most have their own internal appeals boards. The appeal process is formal and procedural. A security clearance attorney is highly recommended for any appeal beyond the initial SOR response.

What is an interim clearance and when do I get one?

An interim clearance is a temporary grant of access that allows you to begin working in a cleared position while the full investigation is ongoing. Interim Secret and Interim TS clearances are common. They are granted based on a preliminary review of your SF-86 — if nothing obvious disqualifying appears, an interim is often granted within weeks. Interim clearances can be denied or revoked at any time during the investigation if issues emerge. Not all positions allow access under an interim clearance — some require the full adjudication before starting.

Official Resources

Intel Brief

Weekly intel from the ranks. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Related Tools

Other legal and career guides

This guide provides general educational information about security clearances only. It is not legal advice and does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Security clearance adjudication is highly fact-specific. If you receive a Statement of Reasons (SOR) or a denial, consult a licensed security clearance attorney before submitting any response.

Published by the Honest MOS Editorial DeskVerified against DoD/.gov sourcesUpdated May 2026Editorial standards