Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson vs Malmstrom AFB
Air Force, AK vs Air Force, MT
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson: "F-22s, Moose, and a Cost of Living Allowance That Barely Helps." Malmstrom AFB: "Missiles, Montana, and Mandatory Appreciation of Nature." Same branch, same oath, two completely different conversations at the FRG meeting.
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson: Anchorage is a real city with amenities. The catch: Long dark winters. Malmstrom AFB: Montana outdoor paradise — Glacier NP nearby. The catch: Brutal Montana winters. Malmstrom AFB: affordable enough to build wealth. Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson: expensive enough that your savings account is a rumor your spouse heard about. Your off-post reality: Anchorage, AK versus Great Falls, MT. Both have their argument. Neither will make it on your behalf. Climate duel: Subarctic — cold snowy winters, cool summers at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson versus Cold harsh winters, pleasant short summers at Malmstrom AFB. Your body will file a formal complaint at either location — the paperwork just varies by season.
Two Air Force installations where the assignment system is a roulette wheel — your marriage, your savings account, and your next five years as the stakes.
Pros & Cons
- +Anchorage is a real city with amenities
- +World-class fishing and outdoor recreation
- +COLA supplements pay
- -Long dark winters
- -Isolated from Lower 48
- -High cost of goods due to shipping
- +Montana outdoor paradise — Glacier NP nearby
- +Friendly small-city community
- +Low cost of living
- -Brutal Montana winters
- -Alert duty at remote missile sites
- -Great Falls is isolated
Known For
Community Takes
Be the first to share your take on Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson vs Malmstrom AFB
Compare Other Bases
Search by name or state, or browse by branch