Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson vs Malmstrom AFB
Air Force, AK vs Air Force, MT
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson: "F-22s, Moose, and a Cost of Living Allowance That Barely Helps." Malmstrom AFB: "Missiles, Montana, and Mandatory Appreciation of Nature." One is what you asked for. The other is what HRC thought you needed. Same Army. Different paperwork.
The whole-family version of this comparison: Malmstrom AFB: affordable enough to build wealth. Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson: expensive enough that your savings account is a rumor your spouse heard about. For spouses: Anchorage has a reasonable job market for Alaska — healthcare, oil industry support, state government, and retail at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. At Malmstrom AFB: Limited. The off-post reality that defines day-to-day life: Anchorage, AK versus Great Falls, MT. Everything else is logistics.
The Air Force put these on the same map and called it force distribution. Service members call it the lottery nobody asked to play.
Pros & Cons
- +Anchorage is a real city with amenities
- +World-class fishing and outdoor recreation
- +COLA supplements pay
- -Long dark winters
- -Isolated from Lower 48
- -High cost of goods due to shipping
- +Montana outdoor paradise — Glacier NP nearby
- +Friendly small-city community
- +Low cost of living
- -Brutal Montana winters
- -Alert duty at remote missile sites
- -Great Falls is isolated
Known For
Community Takes
Be the first to share your take on Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson vs Malmstrom AFB
Compare Other Bases
Search by name or state, or browse by branch