Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson vs Malmstrom AFB
Air Force, AK vs Air Force, MT
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson: "F-22s, Moose, and a Cost of Living Allowance That Barely Helps." Malmstrom AFB: "Missiles, Montana, and Mandatory Appreciation of Nature." HRC threw two darts at a map and your entire quality of life hangs on which one stuck.
The whole-family version of this comparison: Malmstrom AFB runs low cost of living — BAH builds actual savings. Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson runs high — BAH builds actual anxiety. Same rank, same base pay, wildly different bank statements. For spouses: Anchorage has a reasonable job market for Alaska — healthcare, oil industry support, state government, and retail at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. At Malmstrom AFB: Limited. The off-post reality that defines day-to-day life: Anchorage, AK versus Great Falls, MT. Everything else is logistics.
Pick your adventure. Or don't — the Air Force will pick it for you, and your preference was filed under "noted and irrelevant."
Pros & Cons
- +Anchorage is a real city with amenities
- +World-class fishing and outdoor recreation
- +COLA supplements pay
- -Long dark winters
- -Isolated from Lower 48
- -High cost of goods due to shipping
- +Montana outdoor paradise — Glacier NP nearby
- +Friendly small-city community
- +Low cost of living
- -Brutal Montana winters
- -Alert duty at remote missile sites
- -Great Falls is isolated
Known For
Community Takes
Be the first to share your take on Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson vs Malmstrom AFB
Compare Other Bases
Search by name or state, or browse by branch