Skip to main content
HonestMOS
●InvestigationsCongress made VA disability claims free to file. An entire industry charges veterans anyway — and nobody can stop them.→
←Back to 2671 Arabic Linguist — overview, pay, training, civilian translation, reviews
2671E6

Arabic Linguist

E-6 (Staff Sergeant) · Marines

E1–E3E-4E-5E-6E-7E8–E9
HEADS UP

You are the language operations chief now — and the language capability map you build for the AOR before the deployment brief is the document the commanding officer uses to make decisions. The NSA/DIA billet window is open at SSgt, and it closes faster than most people think. The GySgt board reads your FitRep profile and your section's DLPT average simultaneously. Both need to be clean when the board convenes.

The Honest MOS Read
Staff Sergeant in the 2671 community is the language operations chief rank — the senior enlisted language authority for the intelligence element. The transition from section NCO to language operations chief is not a promotion that comes with more of the same work. It is a fundamentally different seat. At Sgt, you ran one section's training program and wrote FitReps on Cpls. At SSgt, you own the language capability of the entire intelligence element: multiple sections if the unit has them, the full dialect coverage map across every linguist assigned, and the advisory function that puts you in the room with the S-2 and the commanding officer when the intelligence requirements are being set. The language capability map is the language operations chief's primary deliverable before a deployment. This is not a spreadsheet of DLPT scores — that is the baseline. The capability map tells the S-2 which Arabic dialects the section can cover and at what proficiency level, which operational requirements from the commanding general's Priority Intelligence Requirements are within the section's language and cultural reach, and where the gaps are. If the operational theater is going to demand Levantine colloquial debrief support and two of the section's four linguists are MSA-only, that gap belongs in the commander's brief before the deployment, not in the after-action review. The language operations chief who presents a capability map that accurately describes what the section can and cannot do — and who presents a remediation plan or a sourcing request for the gaps — is the SSgt the S-2 trusts to run the language function without oversight. FLPP administration for the full section under DoDI 7280.3 is the SSgt's administrative anchor task. Every linguist in the section has a DLPT test date, a current score, a language designator, and a pay tier. The SSgt who does not know one linguist's FLPP status when the S-2 asks at the monthly readiness brief is the SSgt whose administrative credibility is gone. Track the full section's proficiency cycle on one working document: name, current score, test date, tier, next window, scheduling coordination status, and remediation plan if the score is trending down. Brief it at the quarterly readiness meeting before the S-2 asks — not after. The DLPT tracking function at SSgt extends into the GySgt board preparation in ways the Sgt billet did not. The centralized SNCO selection board reads FitRep relative value — which means the FitRep narratives the SSgt writes on his Sgts are the documents that determine whether those Sgts make SSgt on the first board. Writing a Section A narrative on a Sgt who ran the section's maintenance training program and raised the section DLPT average from below the battalion standard to above it in 18 months is a different document than writing a Section A on a Sgt who performed language work at high quality personally. The distinction is between section leadership and individual performance, and the GySgt board knows the difference. NSA and DIA billet pipelines open formally at SSgt in a way they did not at Sgt. At Sgt, nomination was possible for the top performers. At SSgt, the national-level IC language billet is an expected consideration — the language operations chief at a Marine intelligence element is the profile those billets are built for. The honest decision analysis: an NSA or DIA tour at SSgt builds IC analytical credentials, security access and program visibility, and a post-service pipeline into civilian intelligence roles that is concrete rather than theoretical. The cost is the MAGTF section leadership track record and the operational credibility that the GySgt board reads. Both are real considerations. The SSgt who makes this decision without talking to the Sgts and SSgts who have taken each path — and without an honest conversation with the intelligence officer and the S-2 — is making a career decision without the relevant data. The DLI adjunct faculty billet at the Presidio of Monterey is an assignment that most SSgts overlook because it does not appear in the standard billet description for the language operations chief track. It is available to senior 2671 NCOs with demonstrated language proficiency and a section leadership record, and the assignment puts the SSgt back at DLIFLC in an instructional and advisory role — teaching the next Arabic language cohort, advising DLIFLC on operational relevance of curriculum content, and maintaining personal language proficiency in an immersion environment that the unit assignment cannot replicate. The SSgt who comes out of a DLI adjunct faculty billet with a 3/3 maintained and a published contribution to the DLIFLC curriculum is the SSgt whose GySgt board narrative is qualitatively different from the standard artillery or infantry counterpart. ICD 206 — the Intelligence Community standard for sourcing and warning intelligence — becomes a relevant reference at SSgt in a way it was not at Sgt. The language operations chief who advises the S-2 on collection requirements is not just managing DLPT scores — he is advising on the quality and reliability of the language-dependent collection the intelligence element is producing. ICD 206 governs how warning intelligence is characterized and communicated; understanding it means the language operations chief can tell the S-2 not just what the section translated but whether the source quality and the collection tradecraft behind the translation are sufficient to support the characterization the intelligence officer wants to put in the product. That is the senior advisor function, and it is what separates the language operations chief who manages the FLPP calendar from the one the S-2 calls when the collection requirement is ambiguous.
Career Arc
  • 01SSgt pin-on via centralized SNCO selection board — language operations chief billet assumption in the intelligence element; FLPP audit and section capability map produced within first 30 days.
  • 02First quarterly language readiness brief to the commanding officer and S-2 — section DLPT averages, dialect coverage map, gap analysis, and sourcing or remediation plan for identified gaps.
  • 03First full FitRep cycle as reporting senior on Sgts — Section A narratives for each Sgt section NCO, attribute evaluations, and relative value placement that the SSgt board reads.
  • 04NSA/DIA language billet nomination window — SSgts with 3/3+ DLPT, clean FitRep record, and intelligence officer backing are formally considered; the window is narrower than it was at Sgt and closes faster.
  • 05Pre-deployment language capability map brief to the commanding officer — specific dialect coverage per operational theater requirement, gap identification, supplemental sourcing request if needed.
  • 06Staff NCO course (SNCO Symposium/equivalent PME) completion — GySgt board reads PME continuity; verify current requirement with the unit SgtMaj.
  • 07GySgt selection board — centralized board reads FitRep relative value across the competitive pool; the Section A narratives on the Sgts developed are the evidence base.
  • 08Career track decision window — GySgt line billet (language operations, intelligence section leadership) vs. Master Sergeant functional expert track vs. B-billet (DI duty, recruiting, DLI faculty); decide before the GySgt board, not after.
Common Screwups
  • ×FLPP documentation gap — a Sgt in the section misses a retest window because the SSgt's proficiency calendar was not tracked, loses pay, and the S-2 finds out about the gap from the finance office rather than from the language operations chief. At SSgt, the administrative failure is visible at the battalion level and it is yours.
  • ×FitRep inflation on Sgt section NCOs — Section A narratives that say 'outstanding NCO, superior language professional, best in the battalion' without specific observed outcomes. The SSgt board comparing two SSgt candidates from the same battalion knows exactly which reporting senior was inflating. The Sgt whose FitRep was inflated gets passed over because the board cannot differentiate him from the inflated peer pool. The language operations chief's FitRep credibility is the currency that moves the Sgts under him.
  • ×NJP, DUI, fraternization, or financial misconduct at SSgt. At this rank, UCMJ action forecloses the GySgt board, removes the language operations chief billet, and in most cases produces an administrative separation action under MARCORSEPMAN. The intelligence element you built runs without you.
  • ×Letting personal DLPT score drop while managing the section's proficiency program. The language operations chief who presents a section DLPT brief to the S-2 with a personal score below the section's target has no authority to hold the section to that target. The S-2 reads both numbers. The GySgt board reads both numbers. A 2/2 personal score while coaching Sgts to maintain 3/3 is a credibility problem that costs more than a FLPP tier.
  • ×Hiding a clearance event — foreign contact, financial delinquency, family member's foreign-national relationship, reportable foreign travel — from the chain because the adjudication timeline seems costly. The adjudication process for a discovered non-disclosure at SSgt is longer, more consequential, and statistically worse in outcome than proactive reporting. Report it when it happens. The intelligence officer can manage a disclosed issue; he cannot manage a discovered one.

A Day in the Life

  • 0500Wake. Check the section group channel and any overnight messages from Sgt section NCOs — any Marine's personal, financial, or clearance-adjacent issue needs to be routed before the S-2 hears about it from someone else. Personal Arabic maintenance: 20-30 minutes of authentic audio content during the pre-PT window — radio broadcast, podcast, or dialect media depending on the current proficiency maintenance focus.
  • 0530PT formation. Language operations chief takes accountability and reports to the intelligence element senior NCO or officer. The SSbt who is the first NCO in formation is the one whose section reflects it. The section's PT standard is visible; the language operations chief who scores 1st-Class is the one whose standard is credible.
  • 0545–0700Unit PT. Run with the section when the schedule allows. Wednesday may be the element hump; Thursday may be the individual PT plan. CFT event rotation in the weekly schedule — ammunition can lift and maneuver under fire are the events the intelligence section's deployment role demands. The language operations chief who trains CFT events with the section is the one whose section does not need a counseling session about the minimum standard.
  • 0700–0830Hygiene, chow. Review the week's FLPP calendar — any retest windows in the next 30 days, any scheduling coordination outstanding. Check the section's maintenance training schedule for the week: which Sgt is running the session, what the session content is, whether the content maps to the section's identified proficiency gaps from the last test cycle. Fix any misalignment before the morning brief.
  • 0830Morning formation or element brief. The S-2 puts out the week's language tasking priorities. As language operations chief, you translate the S-2's priorities into specific task assignments for the Sgt section NCOs — which section handles which DOCEX block, which linguist supports the debrief schedule, which section runs the maintenance training event this week. Brief the Sgts; the Sgts brief the Cpls. The intelligence element that is waiting for the language operations chief to tell individual linguists what to do at 1000 has a chain-of-NCO problem.
  • 0900–1130Primary work event — either language operations administration (FLPP calendar update, capability map revision for a new collection requirement, FitRep Section A drafting for the Sgt whose cycle closes this quarter, quarterly readiness brief preparation) or operational language advisory (reviewing section products before they go to the intelligence officer, advising the S-2 on a collection product's source reliability characterization, running the language section's contribution to the intelligence planning cycle). As language operations chief, you are coordinating the sections and advising the S-2 — not performing the individual translation and interpretation tasks that belong to the Sgt and Cpl linguists.
  • 1130–1300Chow. The SSbt who eats with the Sgt section NCOs — not with the officers, not alone — is building the advisor relationship that makes the Sgt section NCOs bring problems to him before they bring them to the S-2. The informal lunch conversation that surfaces a Cpl's FLPP gap or a section's dialect coverage problem is the conversation that prevents the quarterly readiness brief surprise.
  • 1300–1600Afternoon work — continuation of morning administrative or operational tasks. Monthly counseling sessions with each Sgt section NCO (DLPT score trend, FitRep Section A preview review, section DLPT average discussion, dialect coverage remediation plan status, SSbt board preparation timeline). FitRep Section A drafting for Sgt section NCOs whose cycle closes this quarter. Personal language maintenance: one written translation exercise at DLPT passage length and complexity. Staff NCO PME coursework if enrolled.
  • 1600–1700Final formation. Intelligence element accountability rendered. Classified materials and COMSEC items verified secured by each Sgt section NCO before the count. The language operations chief who verifies the section's material accountability through the Sgt section NCOs — rather than personally — is building the accountability chain that does not collapse when the SSbt is away.
  • 1700Liberty call — same brief, same day, every week: liberty standards, DUI consequences, call the Sgt section NCO first, who calls the SSbt. The language operations chief who gives this brief every Friday is the one whose Marines call the Sgt section NCO first.
  • 1700–2000Personal time — language maintenance (Arabic-language audio, dialect media, vocabulary review for the current proficiency gap domain), FitRep Section A drafting, Staff NCO PME coursework, education credits through Tuition Assistance, personal administration.
  • 2000–2200If a Sgt section NCO calls with a Marine's personal, financial, legal, or clearance-adjacent issue — you advise the Sgt on routing. Command Financial Specialist for financial, legal assistance for legal, chaplain or behavioral health for personal crisis. The clearance-adjacent issue goes to the intelligence officer through you — not from the Sgt directly to the security manager. The language operations chief who routes correctly and completely is the one the intelligence officer trusts to manage the section's clearance pipeline without daily oversight.
  • PRE-DEPLOYMENT WORKUPThe garrison schedule collapses to deployment preparation tempo. Language capability map update against the current AOR requirements — dialect coverage re-assessed against each linguist's current proficiency, sourcing requests submitted for identified gaps. DLPT remediation intensified for linguists below threshold: six-week structured preparation windows for every pending retest. Debrief and DOCEX task rehearsals run weekly. FitRep cycles accelerated to match the deployment timeline. The S-2's pre-deployment intelligence readiness brief includes the language section's readiness status; the language operations chief's input is the most consequential single brief element because it defines what the commanding officer can and cannot do in the operational environment.
  • DEPLOYMENT / OPERATIONAL TEMPOSection maintenance training runs in the margins of the operational schedule — structured vocabulary review during transit, listening exercises during planning period downtime, product quality review sessions when the section has an uninterrupted window. FLPP calendar tracking does not stop because the section is deployed; missed retest windows accrue retroactive pay adjustments regardless of the operational context. The language operations chief who maintained the section's administrative cycle through the deployment comes back to a clean record. The one who let the administrative cycle lapse comes back to a remediation workload that consumes the first month of garrison operations.

Weekly Cadence

Monday is the language operations chief's planning and administrative day — the day the week's language tasking assignments are issued, the FLPP calendar is reviewed for the next 30-day window, and the maintenance training schedule for the week is confirmed against the section's current proficiency gap analysis. Spend the first 30 minutes building the week's execution plan with specific outputs: which Sgt section NCO handles which DOCEX block, what the maintenance training event looks like for each section this week, which FitRep Section A drafts are due this week, and whether any DLPT retest coordination needs to happen with the DLPT administrator before Friday. Brief the Sgt section NCOs before 0900 with specific assignments and the standard for each. The intelligence element whose language operations chief issues the weekly execution plan at 0845 is the element whose Sgts have time to prepare before the S-2's morning brief. Tuesday through Thursday is the operational and development rhythm. Language tasking runs on the intelligence section's production schedule — DOCEX translation, debrief support, command advisory language events — and the language operations chief is coordinating the Sgt section NCOs' task assignments and monitoring product quality through the Sgts' review function, not personally reviewing every Cpl-produced document. One of these days is the section maintenance training day: a structured 60-minute session run by the Sgt section NCO, observed or reviewed by the language operations chief, with a session log and a gap assessment at the end. The language operations chief who attends maintenance training as an observer rather than a participant is evaluating the Sgt section NCO's training program delivery — which goes into the quarterly counseling observation log, which feeds the FitRep Section A. Friday is administrative execution and professional development. FLPP calendar update — every linguist's test date, tier, next window, scheduling status reviewed. Monthly counseling session for the Sgt section NCOs whose cycle falls on this Friday: DLPT score trend, section average vs. battalion standard, FitRep Section A preview if the cycle is closing this quarter, SSbt board preparation timeline for the Sgts who are in the competitive window. Personal language maintenance: the 30-minute written translation exercise that cannot be displaced by the administrative calendar. The language operations chief whose Friday is structured around administrative execution and personal maintenance is the one who arrives at Monday's planning brief with current FLPP data, current FitRep drafts, and a current capability map — and does not spend Monday recovering from Friday's incomplete work. The quarterly readiness brief quality is directly proportional to the consistency of the Friday administrative execution cycle.

Key Skills — How to Drill Each

  1. 01
    Build the language capability map for the AOR — dialect coverage per linguist, proficiency tier per dialect, gap analysis against the operational theater's Priority Intelligence Requirements.
    The capability map is a two-layer document. Layer one is the DLPT baseline: each linguist's current MSA scores (Listening/Reading), test date, and FLPP tier per DoDI 7280.3. Layer two is the operational overlay: for each linguist, document the regional dialect they have demonstrated proficiency in — Egyptian, Levantine, Gulf, Maghrebi, Iraqi — and at what functional level (receptive comprehension only, conversational, debrief-capable, document-capable). Map the overlay against the commanding general's current Priority Intelligence Requirements and identify where the section's dialect and cultural capability is sufficient, where it is marginal, and where it is absent. The gap analysis goes into the commander's pre-deployment brief — not buried in an annex but named specifically. The language operations chief who presents an honest gap analysis with a sourcing request or a remediation plan earns the commanding officer's confidence. The one who presents a gap-free capability map and then discovers the gap during the first debrief does not.
  2. 02
    Administer FLPP eligibility for the full section under DoDI 7280.3 — test schedule tracking, score-tier administration, scheduling coordination, and pay adjustment documentation.
    FLPP administration at the section level is a recurring cycle, not a quarterly task. For each linguist in the section: current DLPT score and test date, current FLPP tier, next scheduled retest window, and scheduling coordination status with the DLPT administrator. Begin test scheduling coordination 45 days before each window — not 10 days before, not the week of. A missed window is a pay event and a documentation event simultaneously; the pay adjustment is retroactive to the missed date, not the discovery date. Keep the full section's FLPP cycle on one working document and brief it to the S-2 at the monthly readiness meeting before being asked. The language operations chief who is asked about a linguist's FLPP status at the monthly brief and does not know the answer is the SSgt whose administrative credibility with the S-2 is visibly compromised. Know every number before every brief.
  3. 03
    Brief the commanding officer and S-2 on section language readiness quarterly — DLPT averages, dialect coverage map, cultural advisory capability, clearance pipeline status, and gap remediation plan.
    The quarterly language readiness brief is the language operations chief's primary accountability event. Structure it in four sections: (1) Current proficiency — section DLPT averages compared to the battalion or regiment standard, individual score trends, linguists in remediation; (2) Dialect and cultural capability — who can cover which dialect at what level, what the coverage gap is against the current operational theater; (3) Clearance and personnel pipeline — any ongoing adjudications, upcoming periodic reinvestigations, reportable events in the period; (4) Remediation and sourcing — what the SSgt is doing about the gaps, what additional sourcing is requested if remediation cannot close the gap before the deployment window. The brief should require no follow-up questions from the S-2. The language operations chief who walks out of the quarterly brief with zero follow-up questions pending is the one the S-2 briefs to the battalion commander as a model section. Prepare the brief data the week before, not the morning of.
  4. 04
    Write FitReps on Sgt section NCOs that the GySgt board can use — specific section-level outcomes, language readiness metrics, NCO development evidence, not personal performance inflation.
    At SSgt, the FitRep Section A on a Sgt section NCO is evidence of the language operations chief's own judgment and investment in NCO development — not just a performance record on the Sgt. The Section A that describes specific outcomes: section DLPT average change during the Sgt's tenure, number of ICD 203-compliant products produced by the section under his leadership, number of Cpls developed to Sgt board competitiveness, dialect coverage improvement in the section — this is the Section A the reporting senior can defend at the GySgt board. The Section A that says 'superior NCO, dedicated to the language mission, clearly the best in the battalion' is the Section A the reporting senior cannot differentiate from the four other SSgts in the regiment who wrote the same language about their Sgts. Draft the Section A from your running observation log, not from the Sgt's self-assessment. Preview it with the reporting senior two weeks before the cycle closes.
  5. 05
    Advise the S-2 on language and cultural context for intelligence requirements — not just what the translation says, but whether the source quality and collection tradecraft support the characterization the intelligence officer wants to use.
    The senior language advisor function is the capability that distinguishes the SSgt from the Sgt. The Sgt section NCO ensures the section produces ICD 203-compliant products. The SSgt language operations chief tells the S-2 whether the ICD 203-compliant product is actually sufficient to support the intelligence characterization being proposed — whether the source's linguistic register indicates the level of knowledge claimed, whether the dialect inconsistency in the DOCEX document suggests the source is not who the collection record says he is, whether the cultural context of a phrase that translates cleanly changes the meaning entirely when the cultural register is applied. ICD 206 governs how warning intelligence is characterized and communicated; knowing it means the language operations chief can flag when the collection tradecraft behind a translation is not sufficient to support the product's stated confidence level. The S-2 who has an SSgt who can do this does not call the Defense Intelligence Agency for the cultural context consultation — he calls his own language operations chief.
  6. 06
    Manage the DLPT maintenance program for multiple sections simultaneously — not just personally executing the maintenance training, but building the Sgt section NCOs to run it autonomously to a documented standard.
    At SSgt, the maintenance program is a system you build and audit, not a class you teach. Each Sgt section NCO runs his section's weekly maintenance training; the SSgt's job is to verify that the program is running to the documented standard and that the outcomes are reflected in the quarterly proficiency data. Build the maintenance program standard as a written training directive: session frequency, duration, structure (listening comprehension, vocabulary drilling, written translation practice), documentation requirements (session logs, score trends, remediation plans for linguists trending below threshold). Audit the program quarterly — sit in on one section's maintenance session, review the session logs, compare the session content to the documented gap analysis from the last test cycle. The Sgt section NCO who is running sessions that do not address the section's specific proficiency gaps is running a compliance program, not a language development program. That distinction is the coaching conversation you have quarterly.

Manuals & References — What Chapters Matter

  • DLIFLC Reg 350-9 — Foreign Language Proficiency
    At SSgt, DLIFLC Reg 350-9 governs the testing procedures, retesting eligibility windows, organizational testing coordination, and the institutional resources available to the command for language maintenance support. The sections on command-requested testing events and organizational proficiency maintenance programs are the ones the language operations chief uses when coordinating a section-wide testing block with the DLPT administrator. Know the retesting waiting periods — the SSgt whose Sgt is trying to rebuild a dropped score needs to know the earliest retest eligibility date — and know the requesting authority chain for organizational testing support.
  • DoD Instruction 5160.70 — Management of the Defense Language Program
    DoDI 5160.70 is the governing document for the language operations chief's two primary administrative functions: FLPP eligibility management and language billet designation. The sections on command responsibilities for proficiency maintenance, FLPP tier structure, language designator assignment and modification procedures, and the consequences for the command when a linguist loses proficiency below the required threshold — these are the sections the SSbt knows at chapter level, not just in general terms. When the S-2 asks why a linguist's FLPP tier changed, the answer comes from DoDI 5160.70. When the S-2 asks whether the command has an obligation to provide language maintenance support, the answer comes from DoDI 5160.70.
  • ICD 203 — Intelligence Community Analytic Standards
    At SSgt, the language operations chief applies ICD 203 as the quality control standard for every intelligence product the section produces, and as the advisory standard when briefing the S-2 on whether a product's analytical characterization is supportable by its sourcing. The most relevant sections at this level are the analytic integrity requirements — specifically the standards for characterizing confidence, the distinction between source reporting and analytical assessment, and the requirements for internal consistency in finished products. The language operations chief who can explain to the S-2 exactly which ICD 203 standard a proposed product characterization would violate, and why the violation matters operationally, is providing a senior advisory function.
  • ICD 206 — Sourcing Requirements and Reliability
    ICD 206 governs how intelligence products characterize source reliability and sourcing quality. At SSgt, the language operations chief advises the S-2 on whether the collection tradecraft behind a translation product — source access, source reliability indicators, collection method limitations — is sufficient to support the product's stated confidence level. ICD 206 provides the framework for that advisory: what source reliability characterizations are available, how collection method limitations are disclosed, and when a product's confidence level needs to be qualified based on sourcing gaps. The language operations chief who reads ICD 206 is the senior advisor the S-2 can cite when explaining to the commanding officer why a product's confidence level was assessed as preliminary rather than confirmed.
  • NAVMC 3500.20 — Intelligence/EW Training and Readiness Manual
    At SSgt, the T&R manual governs the section's collective task standards at the section level and the language operations chief's role in certifying the section's readiness for deployment. The SSgt-level tasks — language capability map production, section proficiency brief, language advisory to the commanding officer — are the collective tasks the pre-deployment assessment evaluates the language operations chief against. Walk through the SSgt chapter with the S-2 during the first 30 days in the billet; the tasks the S-2 expects are the tasks in the T&R manual, and the language operations chief who is certified on them before the pre-deployment assessment is not learning the standard during the evaluation.
  • MCO 1610.7 — Performance Evaluation System
    At SSgt, writing FitReps on Sgt section NCOs is the most consequential administrative function the language operations chief performs. The GySgt board outcome for the Sgts under the SSbt is directly connected to the quality of the Section A narratives the SSbt produces. MCO 1610.7 governs the relative value placement mechanics — how the reporting senior places this Sgt against every other Sgt in the reporting pool, what the reviewing officer reads when comparing relative value placements across the battalion, and what the adverse FitRep procedures require if a Sgt's performance drops significantly during the rating period. Verify the current revision on Marines.mil before citing policy at the GySgt board cycle.
  • MCO 1400.32 — Marine Corps Promotion Manual
    The GySgt selection board runs through the centralized SNCO selection process under MCO 1400.32. Read the board mechanics chapter at the SSbt level with a different question than you read it at Sgt: not 'what does the board read about me' but 'what does the board read about the Sgts I wrote FitReps on, and is my relative value placement credible in the competitive pool.' The language operations chief whose FitRep pool produces two or three SSbt selections in the same cycle — because the Section A narratives were specific, defensible, and differentiated by actual performance outcomes — is the SSbt whose own GySgt board narrative reflects the most consequential kind of NCO development.
  • MCO 1000.9 — Marine Corps Reenlistment Program
    At SSbt, the reenlistment decisions of the Sgts and Cpls in the section run through the language operations chief's advisory function. The current SRB tier for 2671 at each reenlistment point, the lateral move options available, the indefinite reenlistment mechanics for Sgts competing for the SSbt board — the SSbt who understands the reenlistment structure under MCO 1000.9 advises the Sgt whose reenlistment window is opening with the same data the career planner will provide, but with the operational context the career planner does not have. The language operations chief who routes every reenlistment question directly to the career planner without providing any of his own contextual analysis is not performing the advisory function the billet requires.

Standards — How to Hit Each

  • DLPT 3/3 Arabic maintained personally — the language operations chief whose own proficiency score is below the target he is holding his section to has no standing to hold it.
    At SSbt, the administrative load is heavier and the discretionary time for personal language maintenance is shorter than at Sgt. This is the specific proficiency attrition risk that the language operations chief must manage deliberately. Build the personal maintenance discipline into the fixed schedule: 30 minutes of authentic Arabic-language audio content during PT cooldown or transit, one written translation exercise per week at the DLPT passage length and complexity, six-week structured preparation window before each scheduled retest. The SSbt whose personal DLPT score is current and documented at 3/3 when the S-2 reviews the section readiness brief is the SSbt whose authority to hold the section to that standard is beyond question. The SSbt whose score has drifted to 2/2 while the section averages 3/3 is managing a credibility problem that cannot be corrected by administrative competence alone.
  • Section DLPT average at or above the battalion or regiment standard every test cycle — the commanding officer reads this number, not just the S-2.
    The section's DLPT average is the language operations chief's primary quantitative performance indicator. It appears in the commanding officer's intelligence readiness brief, in the FitRep narrative the S-2 writes on the SSbt, and in the quarterly language readiness documentation that goes to the battalion or regimental intelligence officer. The way to keep it at or above the battalion standard: (1) Know every linguist's score and trend before every brief. (2) Build remediation plans for linguists trending below threshold at least 90 days before the next retest window — not the week before. (3) Document the remediation plans. (4) Brief the trend line proactively, not reactively. The language operations chief whose section average rises during his tenure while the battalion average holds flat is building the FitRep narrative the S-2 can defend at the GySgt board.
  • Staff NCO course PME completion — verify the current requirement with the unit SgtMaj; the GySgt board reads PME continuity across the career.
    The SSbt-level PME requirement for the Marine Corps SNCO community is the Staff NCO Symposium or equivalent course — verify the current title and requirement with the unit SgtMaj, as PME program names and structures are periodically revised. Schedule the slot through the intelligence element chain 90 days before the course drop. For the language operations chief, the PME challenge is the same one that plagued the Sgt: the operational calendar (pre-deployment workup, field rotations, MEU manifest) competes with the in-residence slot. The correct response is the same: schedule in-residence, document the conflict if deployment forces CDET, and complete CDET to the in-residence standard. The GySgt board reads PME completion. A gap at the SSbt level is more costly than a gap at the Sgt level because the competitive pool is smaller and every board input matters more.
  • 1st-Class PFT and CFT under MCO 6100.13 — the language operations chief's fitness score is the visible standard for the intelligence element.
    At SSbt, the physical fitness standard is less about personal performance and more about institutional signal. The intelligence section's fitness culture — whether linguists take the PFT and CFT seriously, whether the section trains for the CFT events specifically or just runs — reflects the standard the language operations chief holds visibly. Train in the open: PT with the section when the schedule allows, train CFT events alongside the Sgts, and score 1st-Class publicly enough that the section's standard is visible without being announced. The language operations chief who is known to train seriously is the one whose section does not need a counseling session about the PFT minimum.
  • Pre-deployment language capability map brief completed and approved by the S-2 before the first deployment workup event — the gap analysis is a planning input, not an after-action finding.
    Build the capability map in the first 60 days of assuming the language operations chief billet — not 30 days before the deployment brief. The first version is the baseline; subsequent versions are updated as DLPT scores are retested, as linguists are reassigned in or out, and as the operational theater's dialect and cultural requirements are refined by the intelligence planning cycle. The capability map that the S-2 approves before the first deployment workup event is the document the commanding officer uses to make sourcing decisions — whether to request augmentation linguists, whether to prioritize a specific dialect remediation contract, whether to request DLIFLC resident support for a specific dialect gap. A capability map that is accurate and complete when it is briefed is a planning tool. A capability map that is optimistic or incomplete when it is briefed is a liability.

Technical Mistakes — Concrete Consequences

  • FLPP calendar gap — a linguist in the section misses a scheduled DLPT retest window because the SSbt did not track the date and did not coordinate scheduling with the DLPT administrator.
    The FLPP pay adjustment is retroactive to the missed date, not to when the gap is discovered. The linguist who missed the window loses pay for every day between the missed date and the eventual retest, with no retroactive correction available. The S-2's monthly readiness brief includes a section FLPP status; the gap appears in the brief before the language operations chief reports it, and the commanding officer hears about the administrative failure from the intelligence readiness brief rather than from the SSbt who owned it. At the FitRep cycle, the S-2's narrative reflects the gap. The corrective discipline is simple and permanent: track every linguist's retest window on a single document, begin scheduling coordination 45 days before each window, and brief the full FLPP calendar at every monthly readiness meeting.
  • Capability map optimism — presenting a pre-deployment language capability brief that characterizes the section's dialect coverage as broader than it actually is, to avoid the conversation about gaps.
    The commanding officer makes sourcing and resourcing decisions based on the capability map the language operations chief presents. A capability map that overstates Levantine Arabic coverage — because the linguist has receptive comprehension but not debrief-capable proficiency — produces a commanding officer who does not request the augmentation linguist until after the first debrief failure in the operational environment. The debrief failure is operationally consequential; the failure to request augmentation in time is the language operations chief's administrative decision; and the S-2 who recommended the overstated capability map to the commanding officer is in the same brief when the operational consequence is reviewed. The language operations chief who presents an honest capability gap with a sourcing request is the language operations chief the commanding officer can trust. The one who presents an optimistic capability map and manages the gap later is the one the commanding officer stops trusting.
  • Doing the FitRep Section A for the Sgt section NCO rather than building the system that makes the Sgt write a clean Section A independently.
    When the SSbt writes the Section A for the Sgt rather than developing the Sgt's capacity to write it, the Sgt goes to the SSbt board without the administrative skill the billet required him to develop. The language operations chief who has been ghost-writing Section A inputs for 18 months is the language operations chief whose Sgts are underprepared for their own FitRep responsibilities — and the FitRep narratives the SSbt produces for those Sgts cannot describe 'developed NCOs capable of independent administrative function' without being false. Teach the Section A skill by reviewing drafts, explaining corrections, and requiring revisions before submission. The Sgt who goes to the SSbt board with three FitRep cycles of independently-drafted, lightly-revised Section A history is the Sgt the board can see developed.
  • Presenting the quarterly language readiness brief to the S-2 with incomplete data — missing one linguist's score, unclear on the dialect coverage for a specific section, unable to answer the S-2's follow-up question about the remediation plan.
    The language operations chief who cannot answer a data question about the section's proficiency status at the quarterly readiness brief is the SSbt whose administrative preparation discipline is visible to the S-2, the battalion intelligence officer, and the commanding officer simultaneously. The quarterly brief is the language operations chief's primary accountability event. An incomplete brief at the SSbt level is not a learning experience — it is a credibility event that the FitRep narrative reflects. The corrective practice is preparation: pull all data the week before, verify each number against the section's records, prepare the gap analysis and remediation plan before the brief, and review the brief with the Sgt section NCOs to confirm the dialect coverage characterizations are accurate. Arrive to the brief with no anticipated follow-up questions.
  • Failing to distinguish between ICD 203 compliance (the product is formatted correctly and the source attribution is clean) and ICD 206 source reliability (the collection tradecraft behind the product is sufficient to support its confidence characterization).
    A product that is ICD 203-compliant but based on a source whose reliability indicators the language operations chief never flagged to the S-2 is a product that misleads the commanding officer about the quality of the underlying collection. When the intelligence product is later degraded because the source's reliability was reassessed — by a CI investigation, a collection review, or a downstream analytical contradiction — the S-2's post-mortem asks whether the language operations chief identified the source reliability indicators at the time of the original product. The SSbt who can say 'I flagged the dialect inconsistency and the access claim discrepancy in writing at the time of the product review' is in a different position than the one who processed the product for ICD 203 compliance without applying the ICD 206 source reliability lens. Know both standards. Apply both.

Career Decisions at This Rank

  • NSA/DIA language billet at SSbt — pursue the joint/IC assignment now, or remain in the MAGTF structure to build the language operations chief track record for the GySbt board.
    The NSA/DIA language billet at SSbt is a different calculation than the nomination at Sgt. At SSbt, the IC billet is a formal career path option with real post-service implications: national-level collection experience, program access and credential development, and a post-service pipeline into GS-12 and above civilian IC analyst roles that a MAGTF-only career does not produce as directly. The cost is the language operations chief section leadership record — the DLPT average the SSbt built, the Sgts developed, the capability maps that the commanding officer trusted — that the GySbt board reads as the primary evidence of senior NCO leadership quality. The honest analysis: the SSbt who takes the NSA/DIA billet is building a post-service capability. The SSbt who stays in the MAGTF structure through the GySbt board is building institutional influence at the regiment and MEF level. Both are legitimate career outcomes. The decision is cleaner if the SSbt has a specific post-service target (civilian IC analyst, federal contractor language officer) than if the decision is driven by dissatisfaction with the unit billet. Talk to SSbts who have taken each path and ask what their GySbt board outcomes and post-service positions look like today.
  • GySbt board preparation — build the language operations chief track record or pursue the B-billet (DI, recruiting, DLI adjunct faculty) for the career diversification marker.
    B-billet at SSbt is a different calculation than at Sgt for the 2671 specifically. Drill Instructor duty at MCRD is a three-year tour where the language work stops entirely — and the 2671 who goes to DI duty with a 3/3 DLPT comes back, statistically, with a score that has drifted without a rigorous personal maintenance program. The DI tour billet marker is positive for the GySbt board; the proficiency attrition risk is real. The DLI adjunct faculty billet at the Presidio of Monterey is the B-billet unique to the language operations chief career path: the SSbt returns to DLIFLC as an instructor and operational curriculum advisor, maintains immersive proficiency in the process, and contributes to the Arabic course in a way the DI tour cannot. The DLI adjunct faculty billet is not widely known or widely pursued — which means the SSbt who identifies it early and builds toward it with the intelligence officer's support is making a less-traveled career decision that produces a qualitatively distinct GySbt board narrative. The MSG program at Quantico opens embassy language work in an environment that keeps the proficiency current. The honest guidance: DI tour is worth considering if the institutional respect for that service credential weighs heavily in the personal calculus, but the proficiency maintenance plan must be built and executed for the full three years. DLI faculty and MSG are the B-billets most compatible with the language operations chief's MOS-specific career investment.
  • DLPT currency management as a career discipline vs. a compliance checkbox — is the maintenance program you are running the minimum required or the standard you would hold a Sgt to?
    At SSbt, the DLPT maintenance question is not whether the score is above the threshold — it is whether the language operations chief's maintenance discipline is the model the section runs on. The SSbt whose personal score is exactly at 3/3 because he tested at a structured six-week preparation window and then stopped active maintenance until the next window approaches is managing DLPT compliance. The SSbt whose personal score is at 3/3 because Arabic-language audio is a daily habit, written translation is a weekly practice, and dialect immersion has been running for years is managing language proficiency. The difference is visible in the advisory quality: the compliance-manager SSbt can confirm the DLPT score; the proficiency-maintainer SSbt can recognize a colloquial register shift in a debrief transcript that changes the meaning of a phrase the formal translation renders as neutral. The commanding officer benefits from the second kind of language operations chief. The GySbt board reads them the same way. The difference is operational.
  • GySbt track — senior language NCO line track (language operations chief at the MEF or regiment level) vs. Master Sergeant functional expert track (regimental or division intelligence staff) vs. SgtMaj track (troop leadership).
    The split between senior SNCO career tracks begins to shape itself at SSbt in the 2671 community. The line track — GySbt language operations chief at the MEF or regimental intelligence level — is the track where the 2671's specific language and cultural advisory expertise is most directly exercised and most visible to the commanding general. The Master Sergeant functional expert track moves the career into staff billets at the regimental, division, or MEF intelligence section — broader scope, less daily language work, more management and advisory function. The SgtMaj track (troop leadership, eventually Sergeant Major of a battalion or regiment) diverges from the language-specific expertise path and runs on the general leadership credential. The honest guidance: the 2671 SSbt who knows which track he is building toward before the GySbt board is the one whose FitRep profile, billet selections, and PME completion are coherent. The one who answers 'whichever board selects me' is letting the institution make the decision. Talk to the current GySbt and Master Sergeant 2671s in the regimental and MEF structure and ask what their billet sequence looked like from SSbt forward.
  • Reenlistment mechanics at SSbt — indefinite enlistment for GySbt competition, lateral move to officer commissioning program, or EAS with the full SSbt 2671 credential package.
    SSbt 2671 reenlistment at the 12-to-16-year mark is rarely a simple re-up decision — it is a GySbt board calculus combined with a post-service market assessment. The SRB amounts for 2671 SSbts are published in current MARADMIN messages; pull them before the career planner appointment. The officer commissioning path (MECEP or ECP) is still technically available at SSbt for Marines with the required educational credentials and the officer candidate profile, but the conversion at this rank is rare and requires the commanding officer's strong backing and an honest self-assessment of whether the skills being developed are more valuable at the NCO senior advisor level or the company-grade officer level. The post-service market for an SSbt 2671 with a 3/3 Arabic DLPT, a TS/SCI clearance with active program access, and a documented language operations chief track record is concrete: GS-12 and above positions in the IC civilian workforce, defense contractor language officer roles, and federal law enforcement analytical positions that value the Arabic language credential. The honest counterargument: the senior 2671 Master Sergeant or SgtMaj with 20 years, a full section leadership track, and a national billet on the resume is competing in a different post-service market entirely. The career planner gives the SRB numbers. The intelligence officer and the S-2 give the honest read on GySbt selection probability. The post-service network — the retired 2671 GYSbts and MSgts who made the EAS decision at different points — gives the market reality. Ask all three.

How the Seat Varies by Unit Type

  • Active component Radio Battalion language section — 1st RadBn Pendleton, 2d RadBn Lejeune, 3d RadBn Okinawa
    The SSbt 2671 language operations chief at a Radio Battalion runs a section whose collection work integrates directly with signals intelligence architecture. The language capability map at the RadBn includes not just DLPT scores and dialect coverage but the section's ability to support specific SIGINT collection requirements — technical vocabulary ranges, communications register proficiency, and the specific dialect coverage required for the RadBn's current collection tasking. The language operations chief who understands the SIGINT collection architecture well enough to brief the language requirement in technical terms — not just as a proficiency average — is the SSbt whose advisory function extends beyond the intelligence section into the collection planning cycle. NSA billet pipelines are more directly accessible from the RadBn assignment than from most other 2671 billets.
  • MAGTF Intelligence Battalion — all-source intelligence production language operations chief
    The MAGTF intel battalion SSbt 2671 runs a language section whose products feed directly into the commanding general's intelligence cycle. The language operations chief at this billet is advising the S-2 on collection requirements that appear in the MAGTF intelligence production cycle — finished products that go up the reporting chain to the MEF intelligence staff. The scope of the advisory function is broad: DOCEX translation quality, HUMINT debrief support, cultural context analysis for the intelligence officer, source reliability characterization for collection products. The SSbt who performs at this level for a full tour builds the FitRep profile and the operational credential that the GySbt board reads as the most substantive evidence of senior language NCO leadership.
  • MEU language support element — language operations chief afloat on ARG shipping with BLT forward-deployed
    The SSbt 2671 language operations chief on a MEU BLT deployment is the senior language authority for the Battalion Landing Team during the entire six-to-seven-month afloat period. The operational context is the full MEU-SOC mission profile: contingency response planning, NEO support, TRAP, VBSS advisory, raid support. The language operations chief manages the section's proficiency maintenance and product quality in the margins of an operational schedule that does not stop for the administrative calendar. FLPP tracking does not pause because the ship is at sea. FitRep cycles do not pause because the section is running translation tasking 24 hours in forward tempo. The SSbt who comes back from a MEU deployment with the section's DLPT average held, the FitRep cycles complete, and the operational capability map updated against the theater's actual dialect and cultural requirements encountered has built the most consequential single-billet evidence package available in the regiment.
  • NSA/DIA language support billet — SSbt language operations chief at national-level IC assignment
    The SSbt 2671 at a national-level IC billet is the senior Marine language NCO in an analytical environment where the baseline is civilian professionals with advanced academic credentials and years of regional specialization. The advisory function at the national level is different from the MAGTF context: less tactical, more strategic; less focused on supporting a commanding general's PIR and more focused on contributing to national-level collection against strategic requirements. The SSbt who performs at this level develops post-service credentials — program access, civilian professional network, analytical tradecraft — that are directly convertible into GS-13 and above civilian IC positions. The operational leadership track record that the GySbt board values most — language operations chief managing multiple sections, developing Sgt section NCOs, building pre-deployment capability maps that a commanding officer trusted — is not built at the national billet. Both tracks produce senior 2671 NCOs of high quality; they produce them for different post-service and institutional trajectories.
  • Reserve component intelligence unit — SSbt language operations chief with compressed drill-weekend proficiency maintenance
    The reserve component SSbt 2671 language operations chief faces the same compressed proficiency maintenance challenge as the reserve Sgt, amplified by the additional administrative load of the language operations chief function. Monthly drill weekends provide limited time for structured section maintenance training; annual training is the primary intensive block. The reserve language operations chief who maintains a personal daily language maintenance program between drill weekends — treating the DLPT maintenance standard as a professional obligation that does not stop when the uniform comes off — is the one whose proficiency score and advisory function remain credible. The centralized SNCO GySbt selection board processes reserve and active component FitRep packages through the same competitive mechanism; the relative value placement favors the SSbt whose FitRep describes language section leadership outcomes, which requires sustained effort to generate in a part-time operating environment.

What Good Looks Like at This Rank

The good SSbt 2671 language operations chief is the NCO the commanding officer asks for by name before the pre-deployment intelligence planning conference — not because no one else can brief it, but because the commanding officer has received the language readiness brief from this SSbt three times, and all three times the brief was accurate, complete, and forward-looking. The gap analysis was honest when there were gaps. The sourcing requests were submitted before the deployment workup, not after the first operational debrief identified the gap. The commanding officer does not wonder whether the language capability map reflects what the section can actually do, because the previous three capability maps were accurate. His Sgt section NCOs write FitRep Section A inputs that the reporting senior endorses without major revision because the language operations chief ran monthly observation-log-based counseling with each Sgt, required draft Section A previews two weeks before the formal cycle, and explained the corrections with reference to MCO 1610.7 language rather than general preference. The two Sgts who pin SSbt during the language operations chief's tour did so because the SSbt identified the FitRep profile gap 18 months before the board, built a section-level language readiness outcome into each Sgt's tracking plan, and documented the development trajectory quarterly. The GySbt board narrative the S-2 writes on this SSbt mentions three Sgts by name and describes the specific section-level outcomes those Sgts produced. The board can read the development chain from the FitRep pool. The S-2 calls this SSbt — not as a courtesy, but as a functional advisory relationship — when a DOCEX product comes back with a source characterization that does not match the cultural and linguistic indicators in the underlying document. The language operations chief who can sit across from the S-2, point to the specific phrase in the original Arabic text, explain the dialect register that indicates the source is speaking from second-hand knowledge rather than operational access, and cite ICD 206's source reliability characterization standard for that assessment — this is the SSbt the S-2 describes to the battalion intelligence officer as the reason the section's collection products are accurate. The GySbt board reads what the S-2 writes. The S-2 writes what he observed. The language operations chief makes it observable.

Preview — The Next Rank

Gunnery Sergeant in the 2671 community is the senior SNCO language authority at the battalion or regiment level — the NCO the commanding officer and the S-2 bring into the intelligence planning cycle at the beginning, not the execution phase. The transition from language operations chief to GySgt is the transition from running one element's language capability to advising on the language and cultural requirements of a MAGTF intelligence element that may span multiple subordinate units, and from writing FitReps on Sgts to reviewing the FitRep narrative quality of the SSbts who write on their Sgts. The advisory function at GySgt is qualitatively different from SSbt in one specific way: the GySgt is the senior linguist and cultural advisor who the commanding officer calls before the intelligence plan is written, not after. The language operations chief managed proficiency and briefed capability. The GySgt advises on how language and cultural capability shapes the collection plan — which sources are linguistically accessible, which collection methods are constrained by the dialect gap, which cultural context factors change the intelligence characterization of a specific reporting stream. That advisory role requires not just a 3/3 DLPT and a current dialect capability profile, but a genuine operational understanding of how language shapes intelligence — not as a translation function, but as a contextual lens the commanding officer uses to make decisions about collection priorities. The FitRep load at GySgt is the piece the SSbt billet does not fully prepare you for. At SSbt you write FitReps on Sgt section NCOs — the section-level outcomes are visible and documentable. At GySgt you write FitReps on SSbt language operations chiefs whose performance is measured at the battalion and regiment level — across multiple sections, against a language capability standard that is more complex and harder to quantify than a section DLPT average. The GySgt whose FitRep Section A on an SSbt language operations chief describes the specific capability map outcomes, the specific Sgt development outcomes, and the specific advisory contributions to the intelligence planning cycle is the GySgt whose reviewing officer — the battalion or regimental S-2 — endorses the narrative without revision. That narrative quality is the GySgt's most consequential administrative output, and building it from the SSbt billet forward is the preparation the transition requires.
FAQ

2671 E6 — Frequently Asked Questions

Q01What does a E6 2671 (Arabic Linguist) actually do?
You are the language operations chief — senior NCO responsible for the language and cultural advisory capability of a battalion-level or MEU-level intelligence element, a Radio Battalion SIGINT language section, or a DIA/NSA language support billet.
Q02What's the most important thing to know as a E6 2671?
You are the language operations chief now — and the language capability map you build for the AOR before the deployment brief is the document the commanding officer uses to make decisions.
Q03What does a typical day look like for a E6 2671?
Time-blocked day at the E6 2671 rank tier: 0500 Wake. Check the section group channel and any overnight messages from Sgt section NCOs — any Marine's personal, financial, or clearance-adjacent issue needs to be routed before the S-2 hears about it from someone else. Personal Arabic maintenance: 20-30 minutes of authentic audio content during the pre-PT window — radio broadcast, podcast, or dialect media depending on the current proficiency maintenance focus, 0530 PT formation. Language operations chief takes accountability and reports to the intelligence element senior NCO or officer.…
Q04What mistakes get E6 2671 soldiers fired or relieved?
FLPP documentation gap — a Sgt in the section misses a retest window because the SSgt's proficiency calendar was not tracked, loses pay, and the S-2 finds out about the gap from the finance office rather than from the language operations chief. At SSgt, the administrative failure is visible at the battalion level and it is yours; FitRep inflation on Sgt section NCOs — Section A narratives that say 'outstanding NCO, superior language professional,…
Q05What career decisions matter most at the E6 2671 rank tier?
NSA/DIA language billet at SSbt — pursue the joint/IC assignment now, or remain in the MAGTF structure to build the language operations chief track record for the GySbt board — The NSA/DIA language billet at SSbt is a different calculation than the nomination at Sgt. At SSbt, the IC billet is a formal career path option with real post-service implications: national-level collection experience, program access and credential development, and a post-service pipeline into GS-12 and above civilian IC analyst roles that a MAGTF-only career does not produce as directly.…
Q06What's next after E6 for a 2671 (Arabic Linguist) in the Marines?
Gunnery Sergeant in the 2671 community is the senior SNCO language authority at the battalion or regiment level — the NCO the commanding officer and the S-2 bring into the intelligence planning cycle at the beginning, not the execution phase.
Q07What manuals and regulations does a E6 2671 need to know cold?
DLIFLC Reg 350-9 — Foreign Language Proficiency (section-level proficiency management, retesting cycles, and FLPP administration you now run for a multi-Marine section).; DoD Instruction 5160.70 — Management of the Defense Language Program (the governing document for linguist management you advise the intelligence officer against).; ICD 203 — Intelligence Community Analytic Standards (the IC-wide product standard your section's finished translations are held to;…

This playbook has no tips yet. Be the first to share what you know.

Published by the Honest MOS Editorial DeskVerified against DoD/.gov sourcesUpdated May 2026Editorial standards