Before you sign the contract, here is what the OSHA disclosure would look like.

Military rotary wing aviation has consistently had the highest Class A mishap rates of any occupational category. The Army has historically averaged 15–25 Class A aviation mishaps per year (USACRC annual data; figures vary by year and operational tempo). Crew chiefs, door gunners, and pilots face elevated risk from flight operations, crash survivability differentials in rotary vs. fixed wing, and sustained ramp/flight line hazards including FOD, rotor wash, and fuel exposure.

EOD personnel sustained among the highest per-capita KIA rates of any support MOS during OIF/OEF operations, driven primarily by IED response missions. Per-capita comparison with combat arms (11 series, 18 series) varies by methodology; EOD's exposure was extreme relative to its population size. Peacetime occupational risk remains elevated due to live ordnance handling, render-safe procedures, and the nature of IED response operations.

Highest ground combat casualty rates during deployed operations. Training injury rates for infantry — airborne operations, live-fire, vehicle operations — exceed most other MOS categories in USACRC ground accident data. Hearing loss rates are significant, and the physical demands create compounding musculoskeletal injury exposure across a career.

Selection pipelines across special operations career fields have documented high attrition, creating sustained high-intensity physical injury exposure before an operator reaches a unit. Operational tempo during OIF/OEF produced high per-capita casualty rates. Long-term musculoskeletal damage is a documented career-pattern outcome for operators. Training fatalities are tracked through DoD casualty reporting (DMDC) and have been documented through congressional testimony.

Military diving fatalities are tracked by the Naval Safety Center. Documented risks include decompression illness, equipment failure in cold-water environments, and hypoxic loss of consciousness in closed-circuit operations. Training pipeline exposure is ongoing, not limited to deployed environments.

Vehicle rollover risk is tracked in USACRC ground vehicle accident data and is a documented cause of Class A mishaps. Heat illness risk during vehicle operations — particularly in desert environments — is elevated. Turbine exhaust exposure and noise exposure from armored vehicle systems contribute to long-term health risk.

Demolitions handling, breaching operations, and bridging create elevated injury risk in field conditions. During OIF/OEF, route clearance engineer elements had significant IED exposure. Hearing loss and musculoskeletal injury rates are comparable to infantry.

Hearing loss rates are among the highest of any MOS due to cannon fire exposure — this pattern is documented in multiple VA claims data analyses and USACRC occupational health publications. Ammunition handling creates additional injury risk during high-tempo fire missions.

Higher-than-average assault exposure, vehicle pursuit operations, and detention facility risks distinguish MP from most support MOS categories. Stress and psychological injury rates are elevated relative to comparable civilian law enforcement baselines.

Elevated hearing loss from sustained proximity to running aircraft. Chemical exposure through lubricants, military hydraulic fluids (MIL-PRF-83282 synthetic fire-resistant fluid; MIL-PRF-5606 petroleum-based hydraulic oil), and JP-8/JP-4 fuels is documented in VA claims and occupational health literature. Fall risk from maintenance platforms and elevated work positions contributes to trauma injury rates that exceed the Army's overall non-aviation average.

Garrison assignment injury rates are broadly comparable to civilian office roles. Deployment creates incidental risk (indirect fire, vehicle movement) but base assignment does not carry the physical training intensity of combat arms.

Garrison signal roles carry relatively low physical occupational risk. Tower climbing (25U, 25L) is an exception with documented fall risk. Deployed environments create situational exposure regardless of MOS.

Non-deployed intelligence roles carry lower physical occupational risk than combat arms. Psychological stress, security clearance maintenance, and sustained irregular schedule exposure are documented long-term considerations.

Garrison medical roles have lower physical injury rates. Combat medic roles (68W attached to maneuver units) carry significantly elevated risk and should be treated as a moderate-to-high risk category during deployment.