Skip to main content
HonestMOS
●InvestigationsCongress made VA disability claims free to file. An entire industry charges veterans anyway — and nobody can stop them.→
←Back to 155A Fixed Wing Aviator (Aircraft Nonspecific) — overview, pay, training, civilian translation, reviews
155ACW3-CW5

Fixed Wing Aviator (Aircraft Nonspecific)

CW3 to CW5 (Senior Warrant) · Army

WO1–CW2CW3–CW5
HEADS UP

At CW3 you are the PC and the technical authority. When you sign the DA 2408-13-1 and tell the chain the aircraft is airworthy for a mission the weather barely allows, that signature is yours alone. Build the credibility to give that assessment honestly — including the days when honest means 'we don't go.'

The Honest MOS Read
The senior Army fixed-wing warrant is the Pilot-in-Command, the Standardization Pilot, and the operational aviation risk advisor that a theater or corps commander relies on to tell them the truth about what the aircraft can do. In that specific combination of roles — flying it, certifying others who fly it, and briefing risk to people who cannot evaluate it independently — the senior 155A warrant is one of the most consequential technical authorities in the supported command. The PC role at CW3 is the first place where the warrant's name is genuinely in front of the mission outcome. Everything that happens on the flight is the PC's responsibility — the weather decision, the fuel state, the approach at minimums, the passenger brief, the crew coordination with the FO. The new CW3 who arrived from two years of right-seat flying knows the systems and the procedures; what the right seat does not teach is the decision-making authority. The authority to say 'we don't go today' when a two-star general's schedule says otherwise is authority that has to be exercised before the first time it matters, or it will not be available when it matters most. The SP/IP designation at CW3 or CW4 adds the evaluation function to the flying function. Signing a DA Form 7122 flight evaluation is an assertion that the evaluated pilot met the standard on the tasks scored. The SP/IP who inflates evaluations because the pilot is a good person, or because the detachment needs more PCs, or because the evaluation period is already behind schedule — is degrading the only institutional record the commander has for assessing aircrew readiness. At a six-pilot detachment, one over-certified pilot in a degraded-weather approach is an accident without the organizational depth to absorb the outcome. The international operations complexity at CW3 and above is the most technically demanding part of the career. Diplomatic clearances that arrive incomplete, host-nation airspace procedures that differ from published FAA/ICAO standards, alternate airports that may or may not be capable of receiving a C-12 with a general officer aboard, and the fuel planning for multi-leg international routes where the published fuel-stop availability does not always match reality. The senior 155A warrant who has been building the institutional knowledge of the theater's airspace, airports, and clearance procedures for years is the warrant the command trusts to execute the overseas rotation — and the one the command calls when the clearance fails at an intermediate stop. The post-Army pathway for the senior 155A warrant is real and the options are genuinely good. ATP hours accumulated, type ratings potentially achieved through the Army or through parallel civilian work, and OSACOM-equivalent experience that the airlines and federal aviation programs value. The CW4 or CW5 who has managed this transition deliberately — with the FAA credentials in order, the ATP count tracked, and the post-service employment conversations started 24 months before ETS — transitions cleanly. The CW5 who waits until retirement day starts late into a market that rewards preparation.
Career Arc
  • 01CW3 PC designation: all MQT complete, Q-1 evaluation record current, PC upgrade evaluation passed.
  • 02First international rotation as PC: theater diplomatic clearance management, multi-leg routing, overseas airport operations, and the VIP airlift protocol at the PC level.
  • 03SP or IP designation: company or detachment standardization authority. Evaluation program currency management begins.
  • 04WOAC completion: the institutional credential and the CW4 board gate.
  • 05Senior billet assignment — OSACOM staff, theater aviation command senior warrant billet, schoolhouse instructor at Fort Novosel, or a joint aviation staff assignment — the assignment marking the transition from tactical expert to enterprise contributor.
  • 06CW4 and CW5 OER profile construction: specific deployment or major exercise outputs, evaluation program management, junior warrant mentorship record, and institutional contribution to fixed-wing doctrine or training programs.
  • 07Transition positioning: ATP certificate, type-rating pathway, post-service employment conversations active at CW4.
Common Screwups
  • ×Signing a flight evaluation with Q-1 on all tasks when the evaluated pilot showed consistent approach deviations that were within limits but trending. The trend is the data. The Q-1 that ignores the trend is the evaluation the Safety Center reads after the next approach event. Write what you observed; let the standard be the filter, not your opinion of the pilot's potential.
  • ×Softening the weather risk brief to the commander because the schedule pressure is real and the mission is important. The senior warrant who says 'we'll see how the approach looks when we get there' instead of 'the current forecast puts the destination at approach minimums at our ETA with a 30% probability of below-minimums — here is my alternate plan' has not advised the commander; they have deferred the decision to the aircraft. The decision deferred to the aircraft does not have a good track record.
  • ×Allowing the unit's international operations clearance procedures to drift toward informal. Diplomatic clearances for OCONUS Army fixed-wing operations are formal theater-level approvals; the unit that starts treating them as routine paperwork that 'usually comes through' is the unit that gets an aircraft held on the ramp at an inconvenient stop. The SP/IP who writes the SOP for international clearance procedures and then does not enforce it has written a document and a fiction simultaneously.
  • ×Failing to write technically specific OER support forms for junior warrants under the rating. 'Excellent pilot, highly recommend' is not an OER narrative — it is a character endorsement. The Aviation Branch board wants to know what the pilot specifically did: 'Completed 14 MQT evaluations, zero Q-2 findings; managed unit international clearance program through 3 major overseas rotations; advanced FO to PC upgrade in 18 months.' That is a narrative the board can evaluate.
  • ×Stopping the civilian credential pathway work because the current assignment is demanding and the airline transition feels far away. The CW4 who stops tracking ATP hours, lets the FAA certificate expire, and defers the type-rating pathway is the CW4 who arrives at retirement with Army flying experience that the civilian market cannot immediately use. The credential work is done in parallel with the Army career, not after it.

A Day in the Life

  • 0500–0600PT. The senior warrant still runs PT. The CW4 who pulls off the PT formation is the CW4 whose junior pilots notice and remember.
  • 0700–0730Arrive at the flight facility. Check the currency tracker — anything coming due in the next 30 days? Review the day's flight schedule. If flying as PC: confirm the flight-planning package is complete from the FO. If evaluating: review the evaluation profile and task standards.
  • 0730–0900Brief. If PC: review the FO's flight-planning package, confirm diplomatic clearances if OCONUS, passenger brief, departure coordination. If SP/IP conducting evaluation: establish the evaluation standards with the evaluated pilot before the profile begins.
  • 0900–1300Flying — mission execution or evaluation profile. PC manages the mission; SP/IP grades and documents during the profile. International missions may extend the flying block into the afternoon depending on legs and fuel stops.
  • 1300–1500Post-flight debrief. If PC: crew debrief, aircraft documentation, coordination with crew chief on any discrepancies. If SP/IP: systematic debrief by task, 45-90 minutes for a full evaluation profile, evaluation form signed and filed.
  • 1500–1700Administrative functions — OER support form review for junior warrants, Q-2 remediation plan status check, coordination with unit S3 on next week's flight schedule for evaluation appointments, any overseas clearance coordination for upcoming missions.
  • 1700–1900Individual preparation — ATP academic review, career-management research, or mentoring a junior warrant through their MQT review or career transition planning.

Weekly Cadence

The senior fixed-wing warrant's week is organized around the mission schedule and the evaluation calendar, with the operational tasking as the variable that can override both. In garrison: Monday currency tracker review and evaluation calendar look-ahead; Tuesday-Thursday primary flying and evaluation periods; Friday administrative close-out, evaluation program status brief to the detachment OIC, and OER support form review if the rating period is active. International missions extend the schedule to wherever the diplomatic clearances and the airspace permit. The evaluation calendar is the senior warrant's administrative responsibility that the mission schedule cannot consistently override. The evaluation appointment that slides repeatedly because 'operations are busy' eventually becomes an expired evaluation and an AR 95-1 finding. Build the evaluation appointments into the flight schedule with the same priority as operational missions — they are not administrative overhead, they are the institutional record of aircrew readiness. The post-Army credential work runs in the gaps. The ATP written exam can be taken any morning there is not a scheduled flight. The ATP hour count can be updated after every flight. The type-rating research can be done in any administrative afternoon. The senior warrant who treats the credential work as background prep is the one who is genuinely ready to transition when the ADSO allows it.

Key Skills — How to Drill Each

  1. 01
    Evaluate a WO1/CW2 pilot across the full platform ATM task list, write a technically precise evaluation narrative, and debrief in a way that builds the pilot.
    The evaluation debrief quality is what separates the SP/IP who advances pilots from the SP/IP who just records grades. Before the evaluation profile begins, show the evaluated pilot exactly what Q-1 looks like on each task — the standard, the observable behavior that meets it, and the observable behavior that would generate a Q-2 finding. After the profile, debrief by task in sequence. For any deviation: what the standard was, what you observed, the specific correction, and one actionable way to eliminate the deviation before the next evaluation. Close the debrief with the net assessment: 'You are Q-1 overall; here are the two tasks to focus on before your next evaluation period.'
  2. 02
    Plan and brief a complex multi-leg international rotation — diplomatic clearances, ICAO routing, international fuel stops, alternate airport strategy.
    International routing planning starts with the theater-level diplomatic clearance status, not the flight plan — if the clearance is not confirmed for every leg, the flight plan is premature. Once clearances are confirmed: route planning using ICAO charts and the theater aviation command's approved corridor structure; fuel planning with international alternate airports verified as capable of receiving your aircraft (size, fuel type, ground handling); NOTAM review for every intermediate stop and the destination; host-nation weather service data for icing and turbulence layers that may differ from the US SIGMET structure. Brief the PC with every leg documented, every alternate confirmed, every clearance status verified.
  3. 03
    Manage the unit's flight-evaluation and currency-management program with zero expired evaluations.
    The 60-day look-ahead tracker is the tool; the weekly review is the discipline. Build evaluation appointments into the flight schedule 30 days in advance. Q-2 remediation plans are tracked separately from the currency tracker — the remediation milestone date and the re-evaluation date go on a separate action list that the SP/IP reviews weekly and briefs to the detachment OIC monthly. The expired evaluation that the OSACOM or theater aviation command finds during a routine review is always the one that was not tracked in the 60-day window.
  4. 04
    Brief the supported commander on operational aviation risk in plain language and give a recommendation with a stated confidence level.
    The risk brief format for a commander who is not an aviator: 'Here is what the aircraft can do under today's conditions (state conditions specifically). Here is the single risk factor that constrains us most (icing, crosswind, visibility, alternate availability). Here is the threshold where I recommend against launching (name the metric — crosswind above X knots, icing probability above Y% in the departure corridor, destination below Z minimums at ETA). Here is the contingency if we hit that threshold before arrival.' Give a recommendation. 'Proceed with caution' is not a recommendation; 'I recommend we launch with the first alternate at (airport) and a firm abort trigger of (metric)' is a recommendation the commander can act on.
  5. 05
    Mentor WO1/CW2 pilots through PC upgrade and the civilian-credential pathway.
    The mentorship conversation has two tracks: the Army PC upgrade timeline (MQT completion, Q-1 evaluation record, evaluation scheduling) and the civilian-credential timeline (ATP hour count, FAA certificate status, type-rating pathway). Have both conversations quarterly. The FO who has not started tracking their ATP hours by month six of flying needs to be told that the clock started the first day they logged flight time. The FO who does not know what an R-ATP is needs to be told before they build a transition plan that assumes 1,500 hours.
  6. 06
    Serve as the technical authority during a mishap review or safety investigation at the unit level.
    When an incident occurs, your evaluation records and currency documentation are the first exhibits reviewed. The SP/IP whose records are current, legible, and technically complete — every task scored, every deviation described with specific observed behavior, every remediation plan documented with milestones — is the SP/IP whose records support the investigation's accurate outcome. The SP/IP whose records are generic, partly filled, or inconsistently graded has created a secondary administrative problem alongside the primary safety event.

Manuals & References — What Chapters Matter

  • AR 95-1 — Flight Regulations
    At SP/IP level you are the enforcement authority. Know the Q-2 and Q-3 administrative procedures well enough to execute them under time pressure — the Q-3 administrative action has a specific forwarding timeline under AR 95-1 and missing it creates an additional administrative problem. Know the mishap reporting timelines; know the Class A/B classification criteria. When the investigation starts, your records and your actions after the event are both on the table.
  • TC 1-210 — Aircrew Training Program (Pilot, Utility Airplane) and platform-specific ATM modules
    At CW4/CW5 you may be a contributor to ATM content through the Aviation Center of Excellence advisory process. Know the standard well enough to articulate why each task requirement exists — the mission requirement it supports — so that junior warrants own the standard rather than just meet it. The SP/IP who can explain the 'why' behind each ATM task produces better pilots than the SP/IP who administers it as a checklist.
  • AR 385-10 — Army Safety Program
    The framework for aircraft mishap investigation and reporting. Senior fixed-wing warrants are assigned to safety investigation panels for aviation events in the supported command. Know the investigation process, the privileged safety information protections, and the administrative separation between the safety investigation and any concurrent AR 15-6 before the assignment arrives.
  • 14 CFR Part 61 / Part 121 / Part 135 — FAA certification regulations
    The civilian-credential crosswalk that maps Army instrument time, multi-engine turbine hours, and OSACOM-equivalent experience against ATP certificate eligibility, 121 first-officer minimums, and 135 PIC requirements. At CW4/CW5 you should know exactly where you stand on the ATP hour count and what specific FAA actions remain before the certificate is complete. Use this knowledge in your mentoring of junior warrants — tell them the math before they have to figure it out themselves.
  • DA PAM 600-3 — Warrant Officer Professional Development (Aviation chapter)
    The career-management framework for the senior 155A warrant: broadening assignment timing, the CW5 designation criteria, and the senior billet options at OSACOM, theater aviation command, or the Aviation Center of Excellence. Use it to advise junior warrants on their career timelines and to position your own senior-billet candidacy honestly.

Standards — How to Hit Each

  • Warrant Officer Advanced Course (WOAC) complete at CW3.
    The WOAC is the institutional gate for the CW4 board and the senior-warrant technical advisor designation. Complete it within the promotion-zone window. The WOAC provides a warrant officer network outside the fixed-wing community that is valuable for senior-billet awareness and broadening-assignment opportunities — the relationships built there are the same ones that surface joint and staff assignment offers at CW4.
  • SP/IP designation current with personal evaluation record maintained.
    Your own evaluation currency is the foundation of your evaluation authority. The SP/IP whose instrument evaluation is lapsed cannot evaluate an instrument approach; the SP/IP whose NVG evaluation is expired cannot evaluate NVG operations. Maintain your own currency program with the same discipline you apply to the company program. The weekly currency tracker review covers both.
  • Unit flight-evaluation program current across all assigned aircrew, zero expired evaluations.
    The 60-day look-ahead tracker is managed weekly. Evaluation appointments are scheduled 30 days in advance and confirmed 10 days out. Q-2 remediation plans are on a separate action list with milestones tracked to the AR 95-1 suspense. The OSACOM or theater aviation command's next ARMS visit will review the evaluation program first; the program that is current when the visit arrives was current before the visit was announced.
  • FAA ATP certificate completed or on a documented timeline to completion.
    The ATP certificate does not complete itself. The timeline: FAA written exam completed (take it at CW3 if not already done), ATP hour minimum met and logged (verify current R-ATP military pathway requirements against FAA current regulations), and type rating obtained at airline hire. The CW4 who has the ATP written done and the hours in order is ready to apply to regional airlines the day the ADSO allows it. Document the timeline explicitly — if the ATP pathway is not written down, it is not a plan.
  • OER profile at Most Qualified or equivalent, with specific performance data in the support form.
    Write the OER support form with measurable outputs: international legs flown as PC, evaluations conducted with zero Q-2 findings (or specific remediation outcomes), junior warrants advanced to PC, institutional contributions (ATM input, SOP revisions, schoolhouse contribution). Give the support form to the rating chain 90 days before the OER close date, not at its close. The chain that has the document early can track performance against it; the chain that gets it on close day is working from memory.

Technical Mistakes — Concrete Consequences

  • Signing a flight evaluation with Q-1 on all tasks when the evaluated pilot showed consistent approach deviations that were within limits but trending.
    The trend is the data. The Q-1 that ignores the trending deviation is the evaluation the Safety Center reads after the next approach event. The SP/IP who normalized the deviation in the evaluation record has told the institution that the standard is lower than it is. When the next evaluation period surfaces the same deviation — now more pronounced, now Q-2-level — the evaluation chain the Safety Center reviews will show that the behavior was present and signed off. Write what you observed; let the standard be the filter.
  • Presenting the weather brief as a recommendation-shaped description rather than a risk analysis with a stated decision threshold.
    The commander who hears 'weather looks challenging but we should be able to make it' has received an opinion, not a brief. When the approach at destination is below minimums on arrival and the aircraft diverts, the Safety Center asks what the pre-mission weather brief said. 'Challenging but workable' is not a documented risk analysis; it is a statement that the pilot expected the outcome to be fine. The risk brief that names the metric — 'destination forecast puts us at 400 overcast and one mile at ETA; our abort trigger is 300 and 3/4; here is the alternate' — is the brief the commander can make a decision from.
  • Allowing the diplomatic or operational clearance process to slide into informality because 'it always comes through eventually.'
    The Army fixed-wing detachment that treats diplomatic clearances as routine paperwork that resolves itself is the detachment whose aircraft is held on the ramp at an intermediate stop during a senior commander's overseas rotation. The international clearance failure is not an operational surprise — it is an administrative failure that originated in the planning process. The SP/IP who wrote the SOP for international clearance procedures and then does not enforce the verification step has written a document and a fiction simultaneously.
  • Failing to document the unit's international routing and airport-capability institutional knowledge in written form that survives the next PCS cycle.
    Small fixed-wing detachments accumulate hard-won knowledge of overseas airports, host-nation ATC procedures, and international fuel-stop reliability that is not published anywhere and that leaves when the senior warrant transfers. The SP/IP who carries that knowledge personally but never writes it into the unit SOP or theater aviation handbook is the SP/IP whose departure costs the detachment 12 months of relearning. One overseas mishap involving a fuel stop that 'always worked before' but is no longer reliable produces a Safety Center report asking whether the information was available in writing.
  • Stopping professional currency in the FAA civilian instrument and ATP-pathway framework because 'I am flying Army aircraft, not civilian aircraft.'
    The senior 155A warrant who does not maintain situational awareness of FAA instrument procedure changes, airspace redesigns, and AIM updates is the pilot flying Army fixed-wing in the NAS without current knowledge of the operating environment. Army fixed-wing aircraft operate under IFR in the NAS; the AIM and FAR changes are not civilian matters that do not apply. The pilot who does not track FAA changes discovers them in the cockpit rather than in the brief.

Career Decisions at This Rank

  • Accept a schoolhouse instructor or OSACOM staff assignment, or stay in a flying detachment?
    The schoolhouse billet at Fort Novosel and the OSACOM staff assignment both provide institutional-level contribution that the CW4/CW5 designation recognizes. The trade-off is flying hours — schoolhouse instructors fly, but at a lower tempo than an operational detachment. The senior warrant who has the operational record and the institutional drive for the schoolhouse is a strong candidate; the one who does not want to reduce flying tempo is honest to stay in a flying billet. The CW5 designation is supported by institutional contribution; the CW5 who has only flown has a strong technical record and a limited institutional footprint. If the CW5 is the goal, one broadening tour before the final billet is the approach.
  • Pursue multi-platform qualification versus depth on the primary platform?
    The fixed-wing force flies C-12, C-26, and UC-35 in different contexts. Multi-platform qualification at the senior level increases institutional utility and broadening-assignment options. The C-12 to UC-35 transition involves a turboprop-to-jet qualification that is genuinely broadening and provides jet time that translates into civilian ATP pathway value. Accept additional platform qualifications when the unit offers them; the additional hours and type experience are useful in both the Army and civilian contexts.
  • ATP certificate timing — complete it during Army service or after ETS?
    Complete it during Army service. The R-ATP military pathway reduces the required minimum hours below the standard 1,500; Army flying time counts toward the minimum; and the FAA written exam can be taken at any time. The type rating is the only component that requires actual airline employment, and it comes with the job offer rather than preceding it. The CW4 or CW5 who has the ATP written exam done and the hours documented is a first-day applicant at the regional airlines the day the ADSO expires. The one who waits until after retirement is six to twelve months behind.
  • CW5 designation — is it the career goal and is the record on track?
    The CW5 designation requires a documented institutional contribution record beyond tactical excellence — evaluation program management, doctrine contribution, schoolhouse or staff assignment, or a mentorship record of junior warrants advanced to PC and SP/IP. An entirely operational CW4 record without institutional contribution is a strong technical record; it may not support CW5 at the Aviation Branch board. Assess honestly at CW4: if the record does not have institutional contribution, accept one broadening assignment. If the retirement plan is at 20 years and the additional commitment is not worth the designation, plan the transition instead.

How the Seat Varies by Unit Type

  • Theater Army or ASCC fixed-wing element — senior PC or SP/IP billet
    The highest-tempo international operations environment in Army fixed-wing. The senior 155A warrant at a theater aviation command is the technical authority for the most complex routing, the most senior passengers, and the most demanding diplomatic clearance coordination in the Army fixed-wing force. The flying record and the evaluation program run here are the most visible in the career.
  • OSACOM — Operational Support Airlift Command
    The centralized fixed-wing airlift management function for CONUS and regional support. OSACOM manages the scheduling and standards for the Army's operational support airlift fleet across multiple detachments and installations. Assignment here provides enterprise-level visibility and program management experience that a single-detachment assignment does not. The flying tempo is maintained but the management scope is broader.
  • Schoolhouse instructor — Aviation Center of Excellence, Fort Novosel
    The institutional contribution billet. The senior 155A warrant in the schoolhouse is shaping the training standards for every future Army fixed-wing pilot. Lower operational flying tempo than a detachment assignment; higher institutional contribution. The senior warrant who teaches at the schoolhouse for two years and returns to a detachment comes back with a perspective on the training pipeline that the detachment-only career does not produce.
  • Joint aviation staff assignment
    The broadening assignment that provides exposure to joint and interagency fixed-wing aviation coordination outside the Army fixed-wing structure. The senior 155A warrant at a joint staff is advising on Army fixed-wing capability in a multi-service context — the joint assignment that the DA PAM 600-3 career model identifies as a broadening priority for senior aviation warrants.

What Good Looks Like at This Rank

The good senior Army fixed-wing warrant is the pilot who the theater commander calls personally when the mission is international, the weather is marginal, and the passenger is the most important person who has flown with the unit in three years. The call happens because the commander's staff has learned that this warrant gives the weather brief in plain language, says 'we don't go' when the analysis supports that, and when 'we go' is the answer, is right about it. Their evaluation program has never had an expired evaluation during their SP/IP tenure. Not because they are near-obsessive, but because the program is built correctly: the 60-day look-ahead is reviewed weekly, the evaluation appointments are on the flight schedule 30 days out, and the Q-2 remediation action list is briefed to the detachment OIC every month. The junior warrants in the unit know their own currency status because the SP/IP told them before they had to ask. That is a culture the SP/IP built; it does not exist by default in a small detachment. At CW4 or CW5, the transition conversation is specific. They know their ATP hour count to within a few flights, know what type ratings the regional airline they are targeting requires, and have taken the ATP written exam. The junior warrants in the detachment know what an R-ATP is and where they stand on the hour count because this senior warrant told them in their first career counseling. When the CW5 retires, the two WO2s they mentored are already building the credential pathway — because they learned from a senior warrant who treated the civilian transition as a mission requirement rather than an afterthought.

Preview — The Next Rank

There is no next rank above CW5 in the warrant officer structure. The senior fixed-wing warrant who has been building the post-Army transition deliberately arrives at the ETS point with credentials in order: ATP certificate complete, type-rating pathway established through a regional airline offer, and the post-service employment conversations that started 24 months ago now closing. The transition is not an ending — it is a career arc executing as planned. The institutional legacy of the senior 155A warrant is the evaluation program they built, the junior warrants they advanced to PC and SP/IP, and the doctrine or curriculum contributions they made through the schoolhouse or working groups. That legacy outlasts the flying career and protects the standards of the fixed-wing force for pilots who never met the warrant who built the program. At the SOAR the institutional memory is the mission itself; in fixed-wing aviation it is the standards, the documentation, and the mentorship that survive the retirement date.
FAQ

155A CW3-CW5 — Frequently Asked Questions

Q01What does a CW3-CW5 155A (Fixed Wing Aviator (Aircraft Nonspecific)) actually do?
At CW3 you are a qualified Pilot-in-Command flying the full range of Army fixed-wing missions — VIP airlift for general-officer and senior-civilian travelers, theater-level logistics transport, ISR platform support (if your unit flies the C-12R/RC-12 ISR family or the C-26), and command-liaison flights that put you into regional airports, austere strips, and international airfields that the airline world does not visit.
Q02What's the most important thing to know as a CW3-CW5 155A?
At CW3 you are the PC and the technical authority.
Q03What does a typical day look like for a CW3-CW5 155A?
Time-blocked day at the CW3-CW5 155A rank tier: 0500–0600 PT. The senior warrant still runs PT. The CW4 who pulls off the PT formation is the CW4 whose junior pilots notice and remember, 0700–0730 Arrive at the flight facility. Check the currency tracker — anything coming due in the next 30 days? Review the day's flight schedule. If flying as PC: confirm the flight-planning package is complete from the FO. If evaluating: review the evaluation profile and task standards, 0730–0900 Brief. If PC: review the FO's flight-planning package, confirm diplomatic clearances if OCONUS, passenger brief,…
Q04What mistakes get CW3-CW5 155A soldiers fired or relieved?
Signing a flight evaluation with Q-1 on all tasks when the evaluated pilot showed consistent approach deviations that were within limits but trending. The trend is the data. The Q-1 that ignores the trend is the evaluation the Safety Center reads after the next approach event. Write what you observed; let the standard be the filter, not your opinion of the pilot's potential; Softening the weather risk brief to the commander because the schedule pressure is real and the mission is important.…
Q05What career decisions matter most at the CW3-CW5 155A rank tier?
Accept a schoolhouse instructor or OSACOM staff assignment, or stay in a flying detachment? — The schoolhouse billet at Fort Novosel and the OSACOM staff assignment both provide institutional-level contribution that the CW4/CW5 designation recognizes. The trade-off is flying hours — schoolhouse instructors fly, but at a lower tempo than an operational detachment. The senior warrant who has the operational record and the institutional drive for the schoolhouse is a strong candidate; the one who does not want to reduce flying tempo is honest to stay in a flying billet.…
Q06What's next after CW3-CW5 for a 155A (Fixed Wing Aviator (Aircraft Nonspecific)) in the Army?
There is no next rank above CW5 in the warrant officer structure.
Q07What manuals and regulations does a CW3-CW5 155A need to know cold?
AR 95-1 — Flight Regulations: you are the enforcement authority at the unit level. Know the waiver procedures, the Q-3 administrative processing timeline, the currency-exception provisions, and the reporting requirements for Class A/B mishaps — before they are relevant.; TC 1-210 — Aircrew Training Program (Pilot, Utility Airplane) and the applicable platform ATM modules: at SP/IP level you may provide input to TRADOC ATM revision through the Aviation Center of Excellence advisory process.…

This playbook has no tips yet. Be the first to share what you know.

Published by the Honest MOS Editorial DeskVerified against DoD/.gov sourcesUpdated May 2026Editorial standards