Skip to main content
HonestMOS
InvestigationsHow EUCOM shelved a tax break for 9,000 troops in Poland — for five years.
Back to AW Naval Aircrewman — overview, pay, training, civilian translation, reviews
AWE5

Naval Aircrewman

E-5 (Sergeant) · Navy

HEADS UP

AW2 is where the AW rating's operational competence and the leadership expectations converge for the first time. You are the section's senior crewman in practice whether or not the watchbill says 'LPO' on your name. The AW3s are watching how you carry the mission, the chief is watching your eEVAL bullets, and the detailer's NEC source-rating NAVADMIN message is driving the next billet assignment. At AW2, the path to AWC (Making Chief in the AW community) is not abstract — it is a documented pattern of operational excellence, mentoring output, and administrative accuracy that starts being built this tour, not the next one. Check current MyNavyHR advancement messages; the AW rating's small community size means Chief selection rates and AW1 advancement quotas are visible in the data.

The Honest MOS Read
You are AW2 — Petty Officer Second Class in the Naval Aircrewman rating — and you are one of the most operationally capable crewmen in your squadron's enlisted flight crew rotation. The aircraft commander calls your name for the sorties that matter. The rescue swimmer works with you because you have demonstrated the hoist timing and the crew coordination discipline that keeps the evolution safe. The senior NFO or instructor pilot in the squadron knows which AW2s to put on the complex ASW tracking evolutions and which ones to save for the currency sorties — and the good AW2 is on the complex sorties. At AW2 in an HSM or HSC squadron, you are the primary SAR crewman on your section's duty rotation. That means when the rescue swimmer goes into the water — training or real — it is your call on cable tension, your timing on the hoist raise, and your crew coordination with the aircraft commander on approach and departure. NWP 3-50.1 is not a document you reference occasionally; it is the operational framework you apply every time the hoist deploys. In an AWF HSM seat, you are managing the acoustic sensor suite on a multi-contact ASW prosecution — classifying contacts, coordinating with the ship's TAO, and making the torpedo-delivery solution call in a training evolution that mirrors real-world ASW combat. In a VP squadron, you are the primary mission system operator on a 12-hour maritime patrol flight, tracking multiple surface contacts, coordinating with other P-8As in the area, and maintaining the sensor picture that the tactical coordinator builds the mission around. The AW2's garrison work has expanded beyond the AW3's scope in two directions. First, training authority: you sign PQS line items for AW3s and AWANs, you run the section's portion of the NATOPS training plan, and your signature on a qualification means the command trusts your assessment of whether the qualification standard was met. That signature is not ceremonial — the NATOPS evaluating officer will hold you accountable for what you certified. Second, administrative depth: the section's equipment accountability, the rescue equipment serviceability log, the flight-hour log accuracy, the crew currency tracking for the crewmen below you — these are the administrative responsibilities the LPO owns, and at AW2 you are the section lead who maintains them in fact even if the LPO title has not been formally assigned. The NWAE for AW1 is the advancement target. The AW rating has a small community pool and competitive advancement quotas that vary annually. The AW2 who builds the BIB study discipline, documents accomplishments in eEVAL language, and manages the section's administrative health is the AW2 the LCPO defends at the advancement worksheet review. The AW2 who coasts on operational reputation without the administrative and mentoring track record is the AW2 who watches the AW1 slate from the bench. The Making Chief conversation in the AW community starts before most AW2s realize it has started. AWC selection boards read the full career arc — where the crewman flew, what NEC subcommunity he mastered, how many AW3s and AWANs he mentored to qualification, and whether the eEVAL profile across multiple commands tells a consistent story of operational excellence and growing administrative authority. The AW2 who is building that story — one sortie, one mentoring interaction, one accurate eEVAL bullet at a time — is the AW2 who will make Chief on schedule. The AW2 who thinks the Chief conversation starts at AW1 is behind.
Career Arc
  • 01Primary SAR crewman / hoist operator — designated and trusted by aircraft commanders for SAR duty sorties, not just currency flights.
  • 02Section training authority — sign PQS line items for AW3s and AWANs; section NATOPS training plan built and executed without LPO managing every step.
  • 03NWAE for AW1 in active preparation — BIB study log documented, advancement worksheet building toward EP/MP recommendation.
  • 04Warfare device pinned (Aviation Warfare Specialist or equivalent for platform) and current.
  • 05NEC subcommunity proficiency at senior-operator level — AWF acoustic classification, AWO hoist/SAR coordination, AWR surface sensor operation, AWV mission system operator — documented in flight logs and eEVAL bullets.
  • 06Reenlistment / SRB decision made with current MyNavy HR data, not rumored rates.
  • 07AW1 eEVAL profile and ranking competitive — the LPO can defend the advancement worksheet at command level without adding context.
Common Screwups
  • ×Performing as the primary SAR crewman beyond your current NEC qualification — taking a hoist evolution or SAR operation that your NATOPS qualification record does not authorize. In an HSC or HSM squadron with a rescue swimmer in the water, the crewman's qualification status is the safety chain's weakest link if it is not current and correctly scoped. The mishap investigation that follows a hoist accident begins with the crew qualification records.
  • ×Letting section administrative accountability slip because operations are busy — lapsed crew currency, incomplete rescue equipment serviceability logs, equipment sub-account discrepancies. The AW2 who manages these well is the AW2 the LPO trusts with more; the AW2 who lets them drift is the AW2 who finds out the LPO noticed at the wrong moment.
  • ×Treating eEVAL season as the time to remember what happened during the year. The AW2 who documents accomplishments quarterly — specific sorties, specific mentoring outcomes, specific qualification completions — produces eEVAL bullets the LPO can use without rewriting. The AW2 who summarizes the year from memory in October produces generic bullets the board cannot differentiate.
  • ×NATOPS open-book evaluation failure or currency lapse at AW2. The administrative standard for NATOPS qualifications is higher at AW2 than at AW3 because the AW2 is signing other crewmen's qualification documents — a crewman who cannot manage his own currency is not trusted to assess someone else's qualification. The LCPO and the NATOPS evaluating officer see this in the same way.
  • ×DUI / NJP / misconduct at AW2. In a small community where every AW2 is known by name at the type wing level, a misconduct entry follows the crewman through every subsequent billet and board consideration. The AWC selection board in the AW community is close-knit enough that the LCPO and the board members may know the specifics personally.

A Day in the Life

  • 0500-0600PT. AW2 personal PT plan maintains PRT Good High standard and water survival conditioning — swim maintenance, run, strength. Senior crewmen in the AW community who let PRT slip are visible; the chiefs notice before the cycle date.
  • 0600-0700Muster, morning quarters, flight schedule review. AW2 is typically the section lead voice in morning quarters for the junior AW section — account for AWANs and AW3s, present the section's status to the LPO, flag any currency items approaching expiration.
  • 0700-0800Pre-flight as primary crewman if on the flight schedule. Gear issue, NATOPS knee-board, brief with aircraft commander — mission profile, crew duties, emergency procedures, SAR procedures if SAR-duty day, communication plan. AW2 often briefs the crew portion of the pre-flight brief from his own prepared notes, not from prompting.
  • 0800-1200Sortie execution. ASW prosecution, SAR coverage, ISR mission, VERTREP, logistics — mission type per the schedule. Operational performance is the record the LPO reads in the flight log and the debriefs. Make the calls accurately; document discrepancies immediately.
  • 1200-1300Post-flight debrief. AW2 often leads or co-leads the crewman debrief portion — what the sensor produced, what the hoist evolution revealed about crew coordination, what needs to be written up. Discrepancy documentation completed before leaving the debrief space.
  • 1300-1400Lunch and section administrative work. Rescue equipment accountability update if the rescue equipment was deployed or inspected on today's flight. Currency matrix check — any AW3 or AWAN approaching a renewal window in the next 30 days?
  • 1400-1530AW3 / AWAN mentoring — PQS sign-offs, NATOPS study session, pre-board review if an AW3 is approaching the qualification board, BIB discussion if the AW2 is mentoring an AW3's advancement preparation. Schedule open-book evaluations with the NATOPS evaluating officer for AW3s who are ready.
  • 1530-1630Section training plan input for the LPO's quarterly review — who is on what qualification timeline, what milestones are due in the next 90 days, what resources are needed. Update the section's training documentation.
  • 1630-1700End-of-day sync with LPO — flag any currency items, maintenance write-ups outstanding from today's sorties, section administrative issues. The LPO who hears from the AW2 at end-of-day does not find out about the issues at morning quarters.
  • 1900-2100AW1 NWAE study block. BIB chapter progression with notes. 30-45 minutes, four days a week. The AW2's study log is visible to the LCPO; make sure it is current.
  • Duty SAR dayOn a duty SAR day in HSC or HSM, the schedule is owned by the strip-alert posture. 15-minute strip alert from 0600 to sunset means gear staged, aircraft pre-flighted, crew ready to launch. The AW2 on duty SAR is the primary crewman for any real-world SAR event that occurs during the duty period. There is no other job today.

Weekly Cadence

The AW2's week in a fleet squadron divides into two tracks that run in parallel and cannot be let drift independently: the operational track (flight schedule, duty SAR rotation, mission proficiency) and the administrative track (section training plan, currency matrix, rescue equipment accountability, eEVAL accomplishment documentation, AW3 mentoring). In garrison between deployments, Monday sets the operational schedule and Tuesday through Thursday are the administrative execution days — update the currency matrix on Tuesday, complete PQS sign-offs on Wednesday, debrief with the NATOPS evaluating officer on Thursday. Friday is the consolidation day: everything that slipped earlier in the week gets resolved before the weekend. During deployment work-up, the flight schedule density increases and the non-flying days compress. The AW2 who managed the administrative track during the inter-deployment period carries fewer open items into the work-up. The AW2 who deferred the administrative work to 'after the next sortie' discovers that the work-up does not have an 'after the next sortie' day. The section's currency tracking and rescue equipment accountability still require weekly attention regardless of the operational pace — that is exactly the kind of discipline the chief is watching for. On ship deployment (carrier or amphibious ship), the week is structured by the flight schedule and the ship's operational cycle. Flight operations, duty SAR rotations, and ship's training requirements layer on top of the section administrative responsibilities. The AW2 on a six-month carrier deployment who maintains clean section administrative documentation throughout — not just at the beginning and the end — is the AW2 the LPO writes the EP-quality eEVAL bullet for at the end of deployment. That bullet is the eEVAL the AW1 board reads.

Key Skills — How to Drill Each

  1. 01
    Operate as the primary SAR crewman / hoist operator on duty SAR sorties — cable tension, hoist timing, crew coordination with the aircraft commander and rescue swimmer — to NWP 3-50.1 standard.
    The primary SAR crewman is the crew position the aircraft commander trusts to make the hoist approach call, manage the cable tension during rescue, and communicate the survivor condition and position during the water pickup. Review NWP 3-50.1 before every SAR qualification event and every duty SAR rotation — not as a refresher, as the operational framework you are actively working from. Debrief every SAR evolution with the aircraft commander and the rescue swimmer using the SAR Manual as the framework: what search pattern, what approach, what was the contingency for a downed rescue swimmer. The AW2 who debriefs this way builds the hoist proficiency the LPO calls 'ready for real-world' in the eEVAL.
  2. 02
    Run the section NATOPS training program — schedule open-book evaluations, sign PQS line items, administer pre-qualification reviews for AW3s approaching the formal board.
    The section NATOPS training program is a published schedule of open-book evaluations, currency renewals, and PQS progression milestones that the LPO posts quarterly. As AW2 you own the execution: who is due for a water survival renewal, whose open-book eval is scheduled for next week, which AW3 is ready for the pre-qualification review before the formal board. Walk the currency tracking matrix every Monday. Contact the NATOPS evaluating officer when an AW3 is ready — do not wait for the LPO to tell you to schedule the board. The crewman who manages the training schedule without being directed is the crewman the LPO brings to the department head as a section lead candidate.
  3. 03
    Operate the subcommunity mission system at instructor-adjacent proficiency — able to brief the system operation, identify deviations from the expected output, and correct AW3 errors in real time during training sorties.
    Instructor-adjacent proficiency means knowing not just what the correct procedure is, but why the correct procedure produces the expected result — and being able to explain the deviation when the output is unexpected. For AWF acoustic processing: when the ALFS display shows an anomaly, the proficient AW2 does not just reset the system — he identifies whether the anomaly is a contact, a noise source, or a hardware fault before calling the aircraft commander. For AWO hoist operation: when the load is swinging, the proficient AW2 identifies the approach angle problem before the aircraft commander has to call 'wave off.' This is the operational depth the AW3s learn by flying next to you.
  4. 04
    Write the section's input to the department training plan — who is on what qualification timeline, what milestones are due in the next 90 days, what equipment and scheduling resources are needed.
    The department training plan is the document the LPO brings to the department head quarterly to show the section's progression toward full qualification. Your input is the section-level piece: AW3 John's next milestone is the NATOPS water survival renewal on 15 August; AWAN Smith is scheduled for the platform pre-flight pre-qual review before the board on 1 September; AW3 Brown's AW1 BIB window opens in October. The LPO who receives section input in this format defends the training plan without rewriting it. The LPO who has to reconstruct the section's training status from scratch at the quarterly review notes the discrepancy on the next eEVAL.
  5. 05
    Mentor the AW3s through the path to AW1 — NWAE preparation, eEVAL accomplishment documentation, NEC upgrade research, career decision support.
    The mentoring relationship at AW2 is not formal counseling — it is the senior crewman in the section making time during the work week to answer the question the AW3 is afraid to ask the chief. Walk through the current advancement rates with the AW3 after quarters one Tuesday morning. Show him the BIB and the study plan structure. Ask him what his next career goal is and whether the decisions he is making this tour support that goal. The AW3 who is mentored at this level advances earlier and performs better on the advancement exam than the AW3 who figures it out alone. The chief will notice which AW2s built a mentoring track record and which ones waited for the LPO assignment to start.
  6. 06
    Manage rescue equipment accountability and serviceability — hoist cable inspection logs, rescue equipment serviceability records, survival equipment currency — for the section's operational aircraft.
    Rescue equipment accountability is the administrative task that is easy to defer and catastrophic to miss. The hoist cable log, the rescue swimmer's survival vest serviceability record, the life raft expiration dates, and the survival equipment kit inventory are legal documentation of equipment status that the aircraft commander relies on when he launches. Walk the rescue equipment accountability once a week with a clipboard and the applicable serviceability records. Discrepancies get written up the day they are found — not deferred to the end of the week. The AW2 who maintains clean rescue equipment accountability is trusted with the duty SAR rotation; the AW2 who has a gap in the serviceability record when the IG asks is the AW2 the LPO names in the finding.

Manuals & References — What Chapters Matter

  • NWP 3-50.1 — Naval Search and Rescue Manual
    At AW2 in HSC or HSM, NWP 3-50.1 is your operational manual, not an academic reference. The sections on hoist rescue procedures, rescue swimmer coordination, search pattern selection, and multi-aircraft SAR coordination are the framework you apply on duty SAR sorties. Know the multi-aircraft SAR coordination section at the level where you can brief a new AW3 on the relevant procedures without looking it up — because someday the new AW3 is the one in the hoist seat on a real-world SAR and you are the one who briefed him.
  • OPNAVINST 3710.7 — NATOPS General Flight and Operating Instructions
    At AW2, you are an authority within the NATOPS program — signing PQS line items, administering open-book evaluations, and presenting AW3 candidates at qualification boards. Know the sections governing crewman qualification authority, currency requirements, and the NATOPS evaluating officer's chain of responsibility. The question the NATOPS evaluating officer asks you when you present an AW3 for a qualification board is the question this instruction answers — be able to cite the section.
  • Platform-specific NATOPS Crew Manual (MH-60R, MH-60S, P-8A, E-6B) — emergency procedures and mission system sections
    At AW2, the emergency procedures section of the NATOPS is not review material — it is the document you are responsible for teaching. When the AW3 on your section asks about the engine failure at hover emergency procedure or the hoist system malfunction procedure, you should be able to answer from the NATOPS without turning the page. Teach the procedure; explain why each step is in the order it is; the AW3 who understands the why remembers the how correctly under pressure.
  • NAVPERS 18068F — NEC Catalog + current NEC source-rating NAVADMIN from MyNavy HR
    At AW2, you are mentoring AW3s through NEC decisions and advising on subcommunity NEC upgrade opportunities. The NEC catalog and the current cycle's source-rating NAVADMIN are the only authoritative documents for this conversation — not the version from two years ago, not what the AW1 remembers from his last billet. Pull the current NAVADMIN before any NEC counseling session and verify the prerequisites and quota availability in the current cycle.
  • NWAE Bibliography for Advancement (BIB) — AW1 cycle, current edition from MyNavyHR / NETC
    The AW1 BIB is where the AW2's advancement preparation lives. At this level, the BIB study is not just about knowing the material — it is about building the documented preparation record that the LPO presents at the advancement worksheet review. Pull the current cycle BIB on the first day of your new tour and build the study log that the LCPO can see and defend.
  • Rescue and Survival Equipment Maintenance Instruction Manual (applicable MIM series for rescue equipment on your platform)
    The rescue equipment serviceability documentation — hoist cable logs, survival equipment currency, life raft inspection records — is governed by the applicable maintenance instruction manual for the specific rescue equipment installed on your aircraft type. The AW2 who maintains these records correctly is the AW2 the aircraft commander trusts to certify the aircraft ready for a SAR launch. The AW2 who approximates the serviceability documentation is the AW2 whose records are audited after a mishap.

Standards — How to Hit Each

  • Primary SAR crewman / hoist operator qualification current and documented — authorized for duty SAR rotation without restriction.
    The duty SAR rotation is the primary operational responsibility of the senior AW crewman in an HSC or HSM squadron. Verify your primary SAR crewman qualification currency against the NATOPS program document quarterly — the same way you verify the AW3s' currency. If there is a currency item approaching expiration, schedule the renewal before the duty rotation conflict creates a coverage problem. The duty SAR officer who finds out the scheduled crewman is not current on hoist operations the night before a duty day finds out in the worst possible way.
  • Section NATOPS training and qualification program running clean — all crewman currency items tracked, no missed evaluation windows.
    The training plan is only as good as the tracking. Build a simple matrix: crewman name, qualification, currency expiration, renewal scheduled date. Walk it weekly with the LPO. Flag anything within 60 days of expiration proactively — before the LPO has to ask. The section that manages its own currency tracking without the LPO chasing every item is the section the department head cites as the model during the readiness brief.
  • eEVAL trait average and ranking supporting EP recommendation — with documented operational accomplishments in action-result-impact language.
    Build your accomplishment list quarterly, not annually. After each significant sortie, SAR evolution, NATOPS qualification sign-off, or mentoring milestone, write a two-sentence summary in action-result-impact format. 'Served as primary hoist operator on 17 SAR training evolutions' is a duty description. 'Operated as primary hoist operator on 17 SAR training evolutions with rescue swimmer, achieving zero cable incidents and earning NATOPS evaluating officer commendation for crew coordination discipline' is an accomplishment. The LPO who has your quarterly accomplishment summaries writes EP-quality eEVAL bullets; the LPO who reconstructs the year from memory writes the same bullet every other AW2 in the command receives.
  • Rescue equipment accountability and serviceability documentation clean — no discrepancies on annual IG or NATOPS program inspection.
    The rescue equipment accountability audit happens without warning during NATOPS program evaluations and IG visits. Maintain the serviceability records in real time — entry made the day of the inspection, not the day before the audit. The hoist cable inspection log entry should be dated on the day the inspection was performed; the life raft expiration date should be in the tracking matrix before the current quarter begins. Zero tolerance for retroactive documentation. The auditor who finds a backdated entry starts an investigation into every other entry in the log.
  • NWAE for AW1 preparation documented and progressing — BIB study log visible to the LCPO before the examination window opens.
    The AW1 advancement pool in the AW rating is small. Show the LCPO the BIB study log every 30 days. The study discipline that produced an early AW2 advancement will be the same discipline that produces an AW1 advancement. Do not restart the habit from scratch; build on the log you started at AW3.

Technical Mistakes — Concrete Consequences

  • Calling 'hoist clear' or 'rescue swimmer ready' before the actual condition is true — under pressure from the aircraft commander to speed the evolution.
    Premature hoist calls have contributed to aviation mishaps where rescue swimmers were injured during hoist recovery, where hoist loads were released under improper conditions, and where aircraft were maneuvered into obstacles because the crewman reported clear before actually checking. The aircraft commander is pressured by weather, fuel, and the operational timeline — your job is to give accurate calls regardless of what the pilot wants to hear. 'Stand by' is a legitimate crew coordination call. 'Clear' when you have not confirmed clear is not.
  • Signing a PQS line item for an AW3 without actually observing or administering the qualification event — rubber-stamping because the AW3 needed the sign-off to make a board date.
    The PQS signature is a crewman's certification that the qualification standard was met. A fraudulently signed PQS certification creates a crewman who the NATOPS program treats as qualified for a task he may not be able to execute. In an aviation context, that gap emerges on an operational sortie rather than in a training environment — which is how crewmen and crew get hurt. UCMJ Article 107 applies to fraudulent official documents in the military aviation qualification program.
  • Operating a rescue equipment system outside the parameters in the rescue equipment maintenance instruction manual — substituting judgment for the documented serviceability standard.
    Rescue equipment serviceability standards exist because the designers tested failure modes. A hoist cable that is 'probably fine' based on visual inspection is not the same as a hoist cable that meets the serviceability criteria in the applicable maintenance instruction manual. When a cable fails with a rescue swimmer on it, the investigation reads every serviceability entry and asks who substituted judgment for the documented standard.
  • Allowing an AW3 to fly a sortie mission type or perform a crew function beyond his current NATOPS qualification because 'the LPO approved it verbally.'
    Verbal authorization does not override the NATOPS qualification program. The qualified status is documented in the crewman's NATOPS qualification record; if the qualification is not in the record, the crewman is not authorized to perform the function regardless of who verbally approved it. The AW2 who allows an unqualified AW3 to perform a qualified-crewman function and the AW3 who performs it are both named in the subsequent NATOPS program investigation.
  • Letting the rescue equipment accountability records fall behind during a high-tempo deployment period and catching up retroactively before the IG visit.
    Retroactive documentation is falsification. The rescue equipment serviceability records are official documents under the NATOPS program and the naval aviation maintenance program (OPNAVINST 4790 series). The auditor who finds backdated entries does not accept the explanation 'we were busy' — he opens a formal investigation into the completeness and accuracy of the entire accountability record for the period in question. Real-time documentation during high-tempo operations is harder than retroactive catch-up; it is also the only standard the program recognizes.

Career Decisions at This Rank

  • AW1 NWAE preparation versus pursuing the warrant officer or LDO pathway before the eligibility window closes.
    The AW community's LDO pathway — specifically the 6120X LDO (Aviation Operations / Maintenance) or the 6130X LDO (Aviation Maintenance) designator — has an eligibility window that typically opens between E-5 and E-7, with competitive applications at the E-6 / E-7 level. At AW2, the career decision is whether to invest the study time in the NWAE for AW1 (the enlisted career path toward AWC) or begin the parallel research on LDO / CWO prerequisites. These paths are not mutually exclusive in the research phase, but the time commitment in the execution phase is significant. Talk to an AW officer (AW designator) or an AW-rated LDO at your command — not someone who 'heard about' the pathway, someone who went through it. Verify the current eligibility requirements via NPC guidance, not memory.
  • PCS assignment preference — staying in community (HSM/HSC/VP) for depth or requesting a billet type that broadens the record for the AWC board.
    The AWC selection board in the AW rating reads a career arc. An AW2 who has served exclusively in one type of command (all HSM, or all VP) has deep NEC proficiency and narrow billet breadth. An AW2 who has served in more than one command type (HSM then a staff or training command billet) has billet breadth but potentially narrower operational depth. The right mix depends on what the specific AWC selection board is looking for in the year the crewman is competitive — and that information is available in the AWC selection board precept, which NPC publishes. Read the precept for the year you expect to be competitive before making PCS preference decisions.
  • Reenlistment timing, SRB eligibility, and the commitment calculus toward AWC.
    Making AWC (Chief) in the AW community is a specific career commitment: it typically requires 16-20 years of naval service, a strong eEVAL profile across multiple commands, demonstrated mentoring output, and the operational depth that comes from sustained AW community service. The AW2 who is genuinely committed to making Chief needs to make the reenlistment decisions that support the 16-20 year arc — including the SRB window decisions that fund the financial plan. Verify the current SRB rates via MyNavy HR (the rates change annually), compare the reenlistment obligation term against the projected timeline to AWC eligibility, and talk to the chief before signing anything. The reenlistment that puts the wrong obligation end-date on the contract can create a situation where the crewman cannot be selected for Chief without serving past the planned career end-point.
  • Building toward the Naval Rescue Swimmer (NRS) qualification or the SEAL / Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewman (SWCC) pipeline from the AW community.
    The AW rating's SAR mission creates a natural pathway toward the Naval Rescue Swimmer qualification for crewmen who are strong swimmers and operationally driven. The NRS pipeline requires a separate application and physical screening process; verify the current prerequisites via NPC. The SEAL / SWCC pipeline from the AW rating requires an in-rate conversion application and typically a BUD/S prerequisite screening. Neither pathway is a guaranteed option for every AW2 — the physical standards are high and the quota availability is limited. The AW2 who wants to pursue the NRS or the SWCC pathway should discuss it with the chief at AW2, not AW1, because the prerequisite timeline and the community timing need alignment that takes more than one year to build.
  • Post-Navy career planning — civilian SAR crewman, government aviation, federal hiring — and what to build now for the transition.
    The AW rating's civilian translation is stronger than most Navy enlisted ratings and weaker than most active-duty crewmen assume. The flight hours are valuable — but only if they are correctly logged in FAA-recognized format, which requires a separate private-pilot flight-log structure alongside the military NATOPS logbook. The civilian SAR crewman market exists — primarily with the Coast Guard Auxiliary, civilian search and rescue contractors, and government aviation agencies — but it requires specific civilian certifications that build alongside the military career, not after it ends. Start the FAA medical certificate conversation with the flight surgeon at AW2. Log civilian-portable flight hours in a separate FAA-formatted logbook from the first sortie. The AW2 who starts this at E-5 has a richer credential package at EAS than the AW1 who starts it six months before separation.

How the Seat Varies by Unit Type

  • HSM Squadron deployed with a destroyer / cruiser / LCS detachment (AWF subcommunity primary)
    The AW2 in an HSM detachment is one of the most operationally independent enlisted crewmen in naval aviation. A two-or-three aircraft detachment aboard a destroyer operates with limited depth: if you are the only qualified primary SAR crewman on the detachment, you fly every SAR-coverage evolution for the duration. The ASW mission intensity on a forward-deployed DDG operating in contested waters means the AWF AW2 is genuinely contributing to the ship's primary warfighting mission — not a peripheral support function. The relationship with the ship's ASW coordinator (the TAO) is direct and operational. The detachment AW2 who understands the ship's ASW picture and communicates clearly with the TAO is more useful than the crewman who flies well but cannot integrate with the ship's combat system.
  • HSC Squadron deployed with a carrier strike group (AWO subcommunity primary)
    The AW2 in an HSC squadron on a carrier deployment has the most complex social operating environment in the AW community. The carrier's flight operations — involving hundreds of aircraft and thousands of people — creates an operational pace that is relentless during strike cycles and management-intensive during all other periods. The HSC AW2's primary missions are duty SAR coverage, VERTREP, and logistics — with the 24-hour SAR strip-alert the operational anchor. The crewman who maintains section administrative clarity and personal NATOPS currency through a 6-month carrier deployment with consistent flight operations is demonstrating the organizational discipline that the chief community reads as Chief-competitive.
  • VP Squadron shore-based deployment (AWV subcommunity primary)
    The VP AW2 in a shore-based deployment overseas operates in a mission-cycle rhythm unlike anything in the helicopter communities. A 12-14 hour maritime patrol mission followed by a mandatory crew rest period followed by the next mission cycle creates a time management challenge the crewman's personal discipline determines — not the ship's schedule or the squadron's duty roster. The AW2 who maintains BIB study, rescue equipment documentation, and NATOPS currency through a high-tempo VP deployment cycle demonstrates the self-management discipline that the VP community and the AWC selection board value specifically. The mission system proficiency level expected of the senior AWV AW2 is high — multi-contact surface track management, ISR coordination, and ASW sensor integration on a long-duration mission profile require genuine operational depth.
  • Training Command / CNATT / FRS (Fleet Replacement Squadron) AW instructor billet
    Some AW2s and AW1s serve in instructor billets at the training command or FRS level — teaching AW 'A' School curriculum at CNATT Pensacola or serving as crew instructor / evaluator at the applicable FRS. This billet produces enormous mentoring output (every AWAN who qualifies and reports to the fleet has been touched by the training command instructor) and builds the NATOPS evaluating authority that future LPO and LCPO billets require. The tradeoff is operational flight hours — training command billets accumulate training hours, not operational hours, and the AWC board reads the operational depth of the career arc. The AW2 who takes a training command billet after one strong operational tour has good billet breadth; the AW2 who has only ever instructed has strong teaching skills and potentially shallow operational depth. Discuss the tradeoff with the chief before requesting the instructor billet.

What Good Looks Like at This Rank

The good AW2 is identifiable in the ready room before the flight brief. The aircraft commander scans the crew list, sees the AW2's name in the primary SAR crewman seat, and does not ask the LPO whether the crewman is ready for the evolution — because the aircraft commander already knows. The good AW2 is the crewman who briefed the hoist procedures, NWP 3-50.1 section references and all, at the last SAR training debrief; the one who wrote up the cable tension discrepancy immediately after the post-flight instead of hoping it would clear itself; the one who had the rescue swimmer's survival vest recertification scheduled six weeks before the expiration date instead of four days after. On the ground, the good AW2 is the petty officer whose AW3s advance on time. He did not do their NWAE studying for them — but he showed them the BIB study structure, walked them through the qualification board format, and wrote the eEVAL accomplishment bullets with them instead of handing them a generic format. His section's currency tracking matrix is current on the Monday morning the LPO asks for it. The qualification sign-offs in the section PQS binders are correctly dated against the actual event days. When the NATOPS program evaluation team visits and audits the rescue equipment accountability records, the AW2's section is the one that passes without a finding. The chief notices this. Not just at the eEVAL period — throughout the year, in the small signals that accumulate into a Chief-board-competitive record. The AW2 who manages the section's operational and administrative health simultaneously, without the LPO reminding him of either, is the AW2 who is already being described in the chiefs' mess as a future AWC. That description — built one sortie and one accurate accountability entry at a time — is the Making Chief story in the AW community.

Preview — The Next Rank

AW1 — the next rank — is where the AW rating's leadership tier shifts from section-lead-in-practice to section-lead-in-title. The AW1 is the LPO in fact, not in assumption: the eEVALs have the crewmen's names on them; the NATOPS qualification board presentations have the AW1's name as the presenting authority; the department head knows who to call when the section's readiness posture needs explanation. The AW2 who has already been doing most of this work — managing the currency matrix, running the training plan, writing accomplishment bullets for the AW3s — finds the AW1 transition manageable. The AW2 who waited for the promotion to start doing LPO work finds it overwhelming. The Chief conversation becomes concrete at AW1. The AWC selection board in the AW community is a small, well-informed panel — every aviation community has fewer chiefs than the surface warfare communities, and the chiefs who select are typically known by name at the type wing. The AW1 who is building the Chief-competitive record is not managing the AWC board as an abstract future event; he is asking his LCPO 'what does my Chief packet need that it does not have right now?' and building toward that answer with every tour, every eEVAL cycle, every mentoring interaction. Making Chief in the AW community is genuinely meaningful. The AWC is the senior crewman voice at the command level — the person the department head briefs the CO with on crewman readiness posture, who the NATOPS evaluating officer turns to when a qualification decision has organizational implications, who the type wing knows as the bench for the next command's senior-enlisted aviation crewman. In a small community, every AWC is visible. Build the record that makes that visibility a professional advantage.
FAQ

AW E5 — Frequently Asked Questions

Q01What does a E5 AW (Naval Aircrewman) actually do?
You are the section lead or the duty senior crewman for a flight schedule that puts your name on the most demanding sorties — ASW sprint-and-drift, mine countermeasures sweep execution, SAR primary crewman in actual distress cases, ISR sensor operator on named tasking, or the AWV avionics/weapons crew lead on an integrated mission.
Q02What's the most important thing to know as a E5 AW?
AW2 is where the AW rating's operational competence and the leadership expectations converge for the first time.
Q03What does a typical day look like for a E5 AW?
Time-blocked day at the E5 AW rank tier: 0500-0600 PT. AW2 personal PT plan maintains PRT Good High standard and water survival conditioning — swim maintenance, run, strength. Senior crewmen in the AW community who let PRT slip are visible; the chiefs notice before the cycle date, 0600-0700 Muster, morning quarters, flight schedule review. AW2 is typically the section lead voice in morning quarters for the junior AW section — account for AWANs and AW3s, present the section's status to the LPO, flag any currency items approaching expiration,…
Q04What mistakes get E5 AW soldiers fired or relieved?
Performing as the primary SAR crewman beyond your current NEC qualification — taking a hoist evolution or SAR operation that your NATOPS qualification record does not authorize. In an HSC or HSM squadron with a rescue swimmer in the water, the crewman's qualification status is the safety chain's weakest link if it is not current and correctly scoped. The mishap investigation that follows a hoist accident begins with the crew qualification records;…
Q05What career decisions matter most at the E5 AW rank tier?
AW1 NWAE preparation versus pursuing the warrant officer or LDO pathway before the eligibility window closes — The AW community's LDO pathway — specifically the 6120X LDO (Aviation Operations / Maintenance) or the 6130X LDO (Aviation Maintenance) designator — has an eligibility window that typically opens between E-5 and E-7, with competitive applications at the E-6 / E-7 level. At AW2, the career decision is whether to invest the study time in the NWAE for AW1 (the enlisted career path toward AWC) or begin the parallel research on LDO / CWO prerequisites.…
Q06What's next after E5 for a AW (Naval Aircrewman) in the Navy?
AW1 — the next rank — is where the AW rating's leadership tier shifts from section-lead-in-practice to section-lead-in-title.
Q07What manuals and regulations does a E5 AW need to know cold?
OPNAVINST 3710.7 (current series) — NATOPS General Flight Instructions; full fluency including the mishap-reporting and physiological-episode reporting requirements you now brief to junior crewmen.; NWP 3-50.1 — Naval SAR Manual, full text. You teach the junior crewmen off Part II and III; you operate the tactical picture in Part IV.; Community TACMAN for your airframe — AWF (MH-60R / P-8A ASW), AWO (MH-60S AMCM), AWR (P-8A / MQ-4C ISR),…

This playbook has no tips yet. Be the first to share what you know.

Published by the Honest MOS Editorial DeskVerified against DoD/.gov sourcesUpdated May 2026Editorial standards